1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1996.tb01925.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carboplatin dosing based on measurement of renal function — experience at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute

Abstract: Carboplatin dosing using a pharmacological formula based on GFR produces accurate targeting of the carboplatin AUC. Tc99mDTPA clearance can be used to measure GFR instead of Cr51EDTA clearance, which is both more convenient and has potential cost savings. Estimates of renal function using the Cockcroft and Gault formula or measured 24 hour creatinine clearance are insufficiently accurate to use for carboplatin dosing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 51 Cr-EDTA clearance method (Chantler et al, 1969) is widely accepted as being accurate and reproducible and was used in many of the initial studies used to derive carboplatin dosing formulae in Europe. Other isotope-based methods, such as those using iodothalamate or DTPA have been shown to be equivalent (Perrone et al, 1990;Millward et al, 1996). However, these methods are relatively costly and are not available in many parts of the world ( 51 Cr-EDTA is not licensed for this use in the USA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 51 Cr-EDTA clearance method (Chantler et al, 1969) is widely accepted as being accurate and reproducible and was used in many of the initial studies used to derive carboplatin dosing formulae in Europe. Other isotope-based methods, such as those using iodothalamate or DTPA have been shown to be equivalent (Perrone et al, 1990;Millward et al, 1996). However, these methods are relatively costly and are not available in many parts of the world ( 51 Cr-EDTA is not licensed for this use in the USA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assessments have usually been compared to CrCl, determined by the 24-h urine collection (Chow and Schweizer, 1985;Pesola et al, 1993;Cochran and St John, 1993). There have also been a number of comparisons of the C&G approximation with [Tc 99m ] DTPA, Cr 51 EDTA and other direct measures of GFR (Davila and Gardner, 1987;Robinson et al, 1990;Kesteloot and Joossens, 1996;Millward et al, 1996;Poole et al, 2002). These assessments have almost uniformly concluded that the C&G approximation underestimates GFR for normal and moderately reduced levels of renal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any such estimate needs to be accurate, convenient and inexpensive, and consequently should be a noninvasive formula-based method, which does not require multiple blood samples or tedious urine collection. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) measurement, through 24-h urine collection, has been used to estimate renal function; however, the reliability of this method is very much dependent on an accurate and complete urine collection, and is therefore frequently unsuitable (Davila and Gardner 1987;McDermott et al, 1987;Chambers et al, 1990;Luke et al, 1990;Robinson et al, 1990;Tsubaki et al, 1993;Millward et al, 1996). Various equations and nomograms have been developed to estimate CrCl from serum creatinine (Scr) concentration (Jelliffe, 1973;Cockcroft and Gault 1976;Martin et al, 1998;Wright et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the elderly, however, serum creatinine is not always beneficial as a marker of renal function since creatinine production is low due to decreased muscle mass (16,17). The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is generally used as an index of renal function and can be accurately measured through the renal clearance of either cold (inulin, iohexol) or radiolabeled (51Cr-EDTA, 99mTc-DTPA) exogenous filtration markers (18)(19)(20)(21). Nonetheless, these methods are seldom available in clinical practice because they are invasive and expensive and require the use of radioelements for isotopic clearance determination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%