2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.675827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carboxyl-terminal Truncations of ClC-Kb Abolish Channel Activation by Barttin Via Modified Common Gating and Trafficking

Abstract: Background: Carboxyl-terminal truncations of hClC-Kb cause Bartter syndrome. Results: hClC-Kb channels lacking the carboxyl terminus still associate with barttin, but are neither stabilized in the membrane nor activated. Conclusion: Truncated hClC-Kb channels are not regulated by barttin. Significance: Elucidating the role of the carboxyl terminus of hClC-Kb significantly improves our understanding of CLC-K regulation by barttin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(107 reference statements)
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As depicted in Figure a, ClC‐Kb expression produced two immune‐reactive bands at about 90–100 kDa and a fainter signal around 100–130 kDa, all absent in NI oocytes. This pattern is qualitatively similar to the one previously described by the group of Fahlke (Janssen et al, ; Stolting et al, ), suggesting that the upper bands correspond to complex‐glycosylated ClC‐Kb meanwhile the lower bands correspond to core‐ and nonglycosylated ClC‐Kb. Quantitatively, the total amount of G437R mutant, whose 90–100 kDa bands as well as 100–130 kDa signal are weakly visible, shows a significant 65% reduction in total protein abundance as compared with WT EGFP‐ClC‐Kb (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As depicted in Figure a, ClC‐Kb expression produced two immune‐reactive bands at about 90–100 kDa and a fainter signal around 100–130 kDa, all absent in NI oocytes. This pattern is qualitatively similar to the one previously described by the group of Fahlke (Janssen et al, ; Stolting et al, ), suggesting that the upper bands correspond to complex‐glycosylated ClC‐Kb meanwhile the lower bands correspond to core‐ and nonglycosylated ClC‐Kb. Quantitatively, the total amount of G437R mutant, whose 90–100 kDa bands as well as 100–130 kDa signal are weakly visible, shows a significant 65% reduction in total protein abundance as compared with WT EGFP‐ClC‐Kb (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As depicted in Figure 4a, ClC-Kb expression produced two immune-reactive bands at about 90-100 kDa and a fainter signal around 100-130 kDa, all absent in NI oocytes. This pattern is qualitatively similar to the one previously described by the group of Fahlke (Janssen et al, 2009;Stolting et al, 2015), suggesting that the upper bands correspond to complex-glycosylated ClC-Kb meanwhile the lower bands correspond to core-and nonglycosylated ClC-Kb.…”
Section: Surface Expression and Protein Expression Of Clc-kb Mutantsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The homologous ClC-K2 channel appears to exhibit properties that are incompatible with whole-cell recordings of ClC-Kb (Pinelli et al, 2016) and may not be used for comparison. We therefore estimated unitary properties using a modified noise analysis according to a method described in Stölting et al (2015). For a regular CLC-type channel with two conduction pathways exhibiting protopore as well as common gating mechanisms (Fischer et al, 2010; Stölting et al, 2014b), combining Equations (1) and (2) results in eqnarrayleftσ2I=i·false(1 - Ppfalse(2Pc - 1false)false) The ratio of variance to the mean macroscopic current depends on the product of single channel amplitudes and open probabilities of protopore and common gates, but is indifferent to variations in the number of channels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They bind nucleotides and are required for nucleotide-dependent regulation of various CLCs (7,17,18,27,28). They have also been suggested to play a role in CLC trafficking (29,30), in the regulation of epithelial Na þ channels by CLC-2 (31), and in the regulation of CLC-Kb by the accessory protein barttin (32). CBS domains also participate, in a poorly defined way, in CLC common gating (33,34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%