2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcass and meat quality characteristics of immunocastrated male, surgically castrated male, entire male and female pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

38
94
10
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
38
94
10
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Schinckel et al (2008) compared growth curves of different sex types from light to heavy weights. However, very few studies have included the immunocastrated pig (Fàbrega et al, 2010;Gispert et al, 2010). It is of interest to include immunocastrated pigs because they are different from EM and from surgically castrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schinckel et al (2008) compared growth curves of different sex types from light to heavy weights. However, very few studies have included the immunocastrated pig (Fàbrega et al, 2010;Gispert et al, 2010). It is of interest to include immunocastrated pigs because they are different from EM and from surgically castrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these results favour castration of gilts to improve quality of primal cuts intended for the dry-cured industry, the European Union legislation on animal welfare does not allow surgical castration of gilts (Gispert et al, 2010). But the results of this experiment might be applicable for other methods of castration of gilts, such as immunocastration.…”
Section: Carcass Traitsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although the total weight of the reproductive organs is lower in IC compared with EM, it is still higher than that in SC because the testes are still present and the accessory sex glands have not regressed to the same extent as in SC. Moreover, there are other factors that can explain impaired dressing percentage in IC, such as increased abdominal fat (Š krlep et al, 2010a and 2010b) and higher weights of intestinal tract, kidneys and liver (Pauly et al, 2009;Gispert et al, 2010).…”
Section: Immunocastrates -Entire Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%