1961
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)65323-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinoma of the Bladder in the Second Decade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When additional data from 20 case reports were included for group 1 patients, few (2%) grade 3 tumors were reported but overall still remained predominantly low grade. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] In contrast, Migaldi et al 5 reported in elderly patients (mean, 70.2±8.4 y) incidences for grades 1, 2, and 3 bladder urothelial carcinomas of 13%, 51%, and 36%, respectively. This distribution in elderly patients had fewer grade 1 and as expected had more grade 3/or high-grade tumors when compared with patients in their fourth decades of life only.…”
Section: Patient Characteristics and Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When additional data from 20 case reports were included for group 1 patients, few (2%) grade 3 tumors were reported but overall still remained predominantly low grade. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] In contrast, Migaldi et al 5 reported in elderly patients (mean, 70.2±8.4 y) incidences for grades 1, 2, and 3 bladder urothelial carcinomas of 13%, 51%, and 36%, respectively. This distribution in elderly patients had fewer grade 1 and as expected had more grade 3/or high-grade tumors when compared with patients in their fourth decades of life only.…”
Section: Patient Characteristics and Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%