1978
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197806)41:6<2131::aid-cncr2820410609>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinoma of the prostate:Treatment with external radiotherapy

Abstract: In recent years external radiotherapy has been selected as primary treatment of patients with carcinoma of the prostate localized to the pelvis. Among 146 patients treated with external radiotherapy at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, the 5 and 10 year survival rates were 64.1% and 40.5%, respectively.The 5-year survival rate was 88.2% for patients with Stage A, 86.8% for Stage B and 58% for Stage C; it was 64.4% for patients with more differentiated carcinomas, but only 28.7% for patients with undifferen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some reports indicate an improved survival in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy, whereas others do not find any difference between patients treated by extensive vs limited pelvic radiation fields [4,14,15]. Prostatic cancer is only moderately radiosensitive, and high total doses are needed to sterilize the primary tumor [16,17], especially if the latter is locally advanced (T3, T4). A minimum dose of 65 Gy has to be given to the primary tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports indicate an improved survival in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy, whereas others do not find any difference between patients treated by extensive vs limited pelvic radiation fields [4,14,15]. Prostatic cancer is only moderately radiosensitive, and high total doses are needed to sterilize the primary tumor [16,17], especially if the latter is locally advanced (T3, T4). A minimum dose of 65 Gy has to be given to the primary tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst overall survival would seem to be the most incontrovertible endpoint to choose for any given analysis, the method of correcting for death from intercurrent disease is variable between the series. None of the major reported series indicate any measures taken with regard to quality assurance cause of death reporting (Cantril 1975, Haferrnann 1981, Hrisiadis 1978, Ray and Bagshaw 1975, Zagars 1987. The use of disease-free survival as an endpoint can be significantly influenced by many factors including frequency and method of follow-up and availability of tests such as radionucleotide bone scans, alkaline phosphatase, and prostate specific antigen assays.…”
Section: Clinical Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%