2009
DOI: 10.4321/s0004-06142009000200008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinoma suprarrenal gigante: Presentación de un caso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extension of ACC to surrounding structures and absence of a clear cleavage at preoperative diagnostic work-up should not represent a contraindication to an aggressive surgical approach: several experiences dealing with giant ACCs treated with multivisceral removal have been reported with satisfactory results [8,10,[12][13][14][15]. This surgical attitude has also been supported by larger consecutive series: data from the U.S. Adrenocortical Carcinoma Database show that 68 among 167 patients (40.7%) underwent adrenalectomy with some en-bloc resection of additional organs (AdEBR) and 26 patients among them had multiple organs removed (mainly kidney, left liver lobe, spleen, pancreatic tail); in this subgroup larger tumor (13 vs. 10 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extension of ACC to surrounding structures and absence of a clear cleavage at preoperative diagnostic work-up should not represent a contraindication to an aggressive surgical approach: several experiences dealing with giant ACCs treated with multivisceral removal have been reported with satisfactory results [8,10,[12][13][14][15]. This surgical attitude has also been supported by larger consecutive series: data from the U.S. Adrenocortical Carcinoma Database show that 68 among 167 patients (40.7%) underwent adrenalectomy with some en-bloc resection of additional organs (AdEBR) and 26 patients among them had multiple organs removed (mainly kidney, left liver lobe, spleen, pancreatic tail); in this subgroup larger tumor (13 vs. 10 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%