“…The analysis of these videos indicated that only two sample elements did not seem to use a pseudonym (the name looked real, but this could not be proven by the chosen method of analysis), the other 23 used a name that is clearly and explicitly identifiable as a pseudonym (nick, phantasy, animal, botanic, number code). The topics of the presented videos were depression, suicidal thoughts, death of a parent, mobbing, self-injury, eating disorders, being the child of divorced parents, the parents' separation itself, bisexuality, cancer, alcoholism, panic attacks, rape, shyness and loneliness (see Misoch, 2014). With regard to visual anonymity, the analysis of the sample showed a very clear trend towards not staying visually anonymous.…”