2021
DOI: 10.33963/kp.a2021.0114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac abnormalities detected by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in healthcare professionals recovered from non-severe COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we do not present CMR mapping as it was unavailable at all CMR centers. Still, T1/T2/ECV CMR mapping and LV strain were mostly consistent with conventional CMR sequences [20,22,23,41]. Finally, all the study patients had clinical indications for CMR, which constitutes a potential selection bias.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, we do not present CMR mapping as it was unavailable at all CMR centers. Still, T1/T2/ECV CMR mapping and LV strain were mostly consistent with conventional CMR sequences [20,22,23,41]. Finally, all the study patients had clinical indications for CMR, which constitutes a potential selection bias.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Twenty-one studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (Table 1 , Ref. [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]). Seventeen were prospective, 3 were retrospective, and 1 cross-sectional.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-ischemic mechanisms include myocarditis, systemic hyperinflammation, hypoxic injury due to severe respiratory infection, and down regulation of ACE2 receptors. All nine studies which separated cardiac injury into non-ischemic and ischemic causes reported a greater prevalence of non-ischemic injury [20,22,24,28,29,32,35,36,38] suggesting that thrombosis and endothelial damage driven cardiac injury is less likely in COVID-19 associated cardiac injury. While Thornton et al [35] reported the prevalence ischemic injury in their cohort to be 17%, they concluded ---Yes Yes Hanneman [25] Yes Yes Yes Yes -Kotecha [28] Yes Yes -Yes Yes Breitbart [20] ---Yes Yes Karaaslan [27] ---Yes -Fijalkowska [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cassar [21] Yes No No Yes Yes Altay [19] No No No Yes Yes Ulloa [36] No Yes No Yes No >3 Months (1566 patients) D. Li [30] Yes Yes -Yes -Kravchenko [29] No No No No No Wang [37] No --Yes -Hanneman [25] No No No --X. Li [31] Yes -Yes -Yes Myhre [32] No No No No No Cassar [21] No No No No Yes Fu [23] -----Joy [26] No No No No No Wu [39] No -No Yes -Peterson [33] Yes No -No -"Yes" refers to presence of the CMR finding; "No" refers to absence of the CMR finding; "-" refers to an unreported CMR findings.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Cardiac Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its exceptional combination of morphological and functional assessment with myocardial tissue characterization, CMR is an optimal imaging modality for detecting the typical signs of acute myocardial inflammation, such as contraction abnormalities, edema, hyperemia, and fibrosis. Although the current "Lake Louise Criteria" (LLC), [4] recently updated to include contemporary parametric techniques [5] for CMRbased diagnosis of myocarditis, have been well evaluated, additional parameters could improve the accuracy and precision of the diagnosis [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, we evaluated the myocardial injury detected by TTE and CMR in healthcare workers recovering from non-severe COVID-19 [6]. Left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced in 29% of these cases as assessed by both TTE and CMR, and global LV longitudinal strain as assessed by echo was also slightly reduced in 39% of the subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%