2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac arrest following anaphylaxis induced by sugammadex in a regional hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma tryptase concentrations were slightly raised during the event, but a subsequent intradermal skin testing showed a positive reaction only to undiluted sugammadex. 18 Similar reports have been noted in patients with preexisting cardiac disease. For instance, a 10-yr-old patient who had a heart transplant underwent cardiac catheterisation under general anaesthesia.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plasma tryptase concentrations were slightly raised during the event, but a subsequent intradermal skin testing showed a positive reaction only to undiluted sugammadex. 18 Similar reports have been noted in patients with preexisting cardiac disease. For instance, a 10-yr-old patient who had a heart transplant underwent cardiac catheterisation under general anaesthesia.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Similar case reports continue to appear in the anaesthesia literature. 18 In 2018, a patient who was being treated for atrial fibrillation with bisoprolol and underwent osteosynthesis was reported. After rocuronium peroperatively, he was given sugammadex 200 mg at the end of surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see that the majority of the sugammadex-related cardiac collapses reported in the literature are due to anaphylaxis. 8,9 As the patient did not have any symptoms that are similar to the cases in the literature or that suggest anaphylaxis such as angioedema, skin rash, sudden hypotension, and as variant angina diagnosis was made after performing coronary angiography immediately after the VF, we do not attribute the clinical picture to anaphylaxis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Sugammadex has been reported to be more efficacious and safer than other drugs, such as Neostigmine, with lower incidence of common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as postoperative nausea and vomiting, dry mouth, tachycardia and dizziness [1][2][3]. However, the incidence of significant ADRs is almost similar between Sugammadex and Neostigmine: hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis [4,5] and, more recently, severe cardiac events such as coronary vasospasm and acute coronary syndrome [6][7][8], AV block [9], hypotension [10] and bradycardia with or without cardiac arrest [11][12][13][14] are described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%