2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Type 1 and 2 Diabetes: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis [ 7 ] in which there was significant heterogeneity, reflecting a variety of sample sizes, participant sources including people with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes selected for clinical trials [ 8 , 31 , 32 ], and methods of diagnosing CAN which ranged from full CARTs to change in heart rate on standing [ 32 ] and heart rate variability (HRV) and QT index on resting electrocardiography [ 8 ]. Our multivariable analysis showed HRs for possible and definite CAN that were close to unity in the presence of other recognised predictors of incident IHD (longer diabetes duration, higher heart rate and increased uACR [ 2 ]). It is possible that relatively intensive CVD risk factor management in FDS2 paralleling trends in other high income countries [ 9 , 10 ] (for example, approximately two-thirds of our participants were taking renin-angiotensin blocking drugs and statins) attenuated both the risk of CAN and its effect on CVD outcomes found in earlier studies, most of which were published before the first FDS2 patient was assessed for CAN [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis [ 7 ] in which there was significant heterogeneity, reflecting a variety of sample sizes, participant sources including people with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes selected for clinical trials [ 8 , 31 , 32 ], and methods of diagnosing CAN which ranged from full CARTs to change in heart rate on standing [ 32 ] and heart rate variability (HRV) and QT index on resting electrocardiography [ 8 ]. Our multivariable analysis showed HRs for possible and definite CAN that were close to unity in the presence of other recognised predictors of incident IHD (longer diabetes duration, higher heart rate and increased uACR [ 2 ]). It is possible that relatively intensive CVD risk factor management in FDS2 paralleling trends in other high income countries [ 9 , 10 ] (for example, approximately two-thirds of our participants were taking renin-angiotensin blocking drugs and statins) attenuated both the risk of CAN and its effect on CVD outcomes found in earlier studies, most of which were published before the first FDS2 patient was assessed for CAN [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only individual CART test predictive of all-cause death was MCR. Taken together, these findings question the need for screening for CAN, as has been suggested [ 2 , 7 ], as part of routine care of type 2 diabetes, especially since the gold standard CART evaluation is demanding for both patients and staff [ 6 ]. In addition, the present data suggest that around one-third of patients will either be ineligible because of age or they will, for various reasons, be unable to complete a valid CART assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diseases associated with or caused by chronic hyperglycemia, such as diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome, have been widely studied for their pathophysiology and complications. Autonomic and cardiovascular complications are well-reported in such cases [1][2][3]. However, the effects of acute relative hyperglycemic states on cardiovascular autonomic functions in healthy subjects have been less explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%