2005
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342031271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Functional Analysis with Multi–Detector Row CT and Segmental Reconstruction Algorithm: Comparison with Echocardiography, SPECT, and MR Imaging

Abstract: Various LV functional parameters were measured with multi-detector row CT with a segmental approach, and measurements correlated and agreed with those obtained with MR imaging. Moreover, functional analysis with multi-detector row CT was more accurate than that with two-dimensional echocardiography or ECG-gated SPECT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
130
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
130
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) were calculated on the basis of Simpson's rule. Subsequently, EF was calculated with EDV and ESV values (23).…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) were calculated on the basis of Simpson's rule. Subsequently, EF was calculated with EDV and ESV values (23).…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because MDCT is a true three-dimenional imaging modality with excellent spatial and contrast resolutions, it is not surprising that functional analysis with MDCT is more accurate than two-dimensional methods compared with magnetic resonance imaging, as found by Yamamuro et al (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous studies have also shown only a moderate agreement between MDCT and two-dimensional imaging techniques, such as LV angiography and echocardiography (11)(12)(13), but an excellent agreement with three-dimensional methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging (1,2,4,13). Because MDCT is a true three-dimenional imaging modality with excellent spatial and contrast resolutions, it is not surprising that functional analysis with MDCT is more accurate than two-dimensional methods compared with magnetic resonance imaging, as found by Yamamuro et al (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, emergency patients and those with heart pacemakers or metallic foreign bodies cannot be routinely examined by MRI. Domestic and foreign scholars (Yamamuro et al, 2005;Busch et al, 2008) used the results of MRI measurement on cardiac function as a standard with which to comparemulti-slice spiral CT MSCT and echocardiography in the measurement of left ventricular function. They found that MSCT is more accurate and reliable than ultrasound measurements of left ventricular function, and that spatial resolution in CT images is superior to MRI, allowing the inner and outer membrane profile of heart, myocardium, and its accessory structure to be displayed more clearly, and facilitating tracing the inner and outer membrane profiles of the heart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%