“…Studies performed mostly with 1 st generation pulsatile LVADs suggest that mechanical unloading can result in improvement in myocardial structure and function, and some patients can be weaned from the mechanical support with sustained myocardial recovery (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). However, the results of these studies on LVAD-induced reverse remodeling and cardiac recovery were variable and inconclusive for several reasons we have recently summarized (10): (1) small size of studies, (2) retrospective design of most studies, (3) non-standardized monitoring of heart function during LVAD support, (4) variations in the duration of LVAD unloading, (5) drugs concurrent to LVAD therapy varied and were not documented, (6) divergences in cardiac recovery criteria/LVAD weaning criteria and (7) diversity of the populations studied with respect to propensity for cardiac recovery (extent of pre-LVAD cardiac remodeling, HF etiology, inclusion of both acute and chronic HF patients, etc.). These issues have led to skepticism as to whether pulsatile LVAD-induced myocardial recovery is a 'real' and consistent phenomenon or an anecdotal experience (10,11).…”