2013
DOI: 10.1177/0023677213494373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac magnetic resonance, transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography: a comparison of in vivo assessment of ventricular function in rats

Abstract: In vivo assessment of ventricular function in rodents has largely been restricted to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). However 1.5 T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) have emerged as possible alternatives. Yet, to date, no study has systematically assessed these three imaging modalities in determining ejection fraction (EF) in rats. Twenty rats underwent imaging four weeks after surgically-induced myocardial infarction. CMR was performed on a 1.5 T scanner, TTE wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-dimensional echocardiography is a well-established tool that has have been largely used for the assessment of cardiac function and structure using techniques and indices familiar from human echocardiography. It offers a rapid and low cost evaluation of heart anatomy, function and biomechanics (Richardson et al, 2013 ) and response to treatment (Bao et al, 2013 ; Matthews et al, 2013 ). But, its results depend on the body complexion, echographic window and the HR of the scanned animal.…”
Section: Imaging In Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional echocardiography is a well-established tool that has have been largely used for the assessment of cardiac function and structure using techniques and indices familiar from human echocardiography. It offers a rapid and low cost evaluation of heart anatomy, function and biomechanics (Richardson et al, 2013 ) and response to treatment (Bao et al, 2013 ; Matthews et al, 2013 ). But, its results depend on the body complexion, echographic window and the HR of the scanned animal.…”
Section: Imaging In Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation studies have been performed on humans but the results cannot be generalized to rodents. Thorough rodent study validations are unfortunately limited to left ventricular function in 1.5-7 T scanners (Nahrendorf et al 2003, Arias et al 2013, Richardson et al 2013. Previous RV studies have only evaluated one particular non-invasive method versus right heart catheterization (Jones et al 2002, Kato et al 2003, Koskenvuo et al 2010 or used modalities beyond general availability (Urboniene et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%