Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM) and apical displacement of papillary muscles (ADPM) are two different pathologies with a number of similar imaging findings that may hamper adequate diagnosis. While ApHCM is associated with increased rate of mortality, ADPM commonly presents with a benign course and differential diagnosis is of great importance. Clinical assessment and 2D echocardiography cannot sufficiently differentiate these conditions, however, and advanced echocardiographic methods may facilitate diagnosis. Although echocardiography is the first‐line imaging method in the diagnostic algorithm, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is the gold standard for evaluating patients due to good spatial resolution and myocardial tissue characterization abilities. When CMRI is contraindicated, cardiac computed tomography may be an alternative reliable method that can also give information about the coronary anatomy. Nuclear imaging may also provide supplementary data regarding hypertrophy and coronary arteries when there is a suspicion of ischemia.