2021
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac response in aversive and appetitive olfactory conditioning: Evidence for a valence‐independent CS‐elicited bradycardia

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri butio n-NonCo mmerc ial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data also provide some support for the notion that pupil dilation responses, as compared with other measures, may be especially well‐suited for tracking appetitive conditioning processes (even though, in line with earlier findings, effect sizes might be somewhat smaller than for aversive UCSs; Finke et al, 2021). This contrasts with results commonly observed for conditioned SCRs, which was found to be less sensitive to reward learning (e.g., Exner et al, 2021; Hermann et al, 2000; Pietrock et al, 2019; but see Andreatta & Pauli, 2015), Interestingly, differential pupil dilation responses averaged across acquisition were positively correlated between valence categories in both experimental groups ( r s > .4), thus supporting the idea of an underlying trait of general ‘conditionability’ or reinforcement sensitivity (Corr, 2004). However, pupil responses to the CS+ app did not show a coherent pattern of associations with subjective judgments as well as with SCRs (see Supplemental Results for detailed results of exploratory correlational analyses).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our data also provide some support for the notion that pupil dilation responses, as compared with other measures, may be especially well‐suited for tracking appetitive conditioning processes (even though, in line with earlier findings, effect sizes might be somewhat smaller than for aversive UCSs; Finke et al, 2021). This contrasts with results commonly observed for conditioned SCRs, which was found to be less sensitive to reward learning (e.g., Exner et al, 2021; Hermann et al, 2000; Pietrock et al, 2019; but see Andreatta & Pauli, 2015), Interestingly, differential pupil dilation responses averaged across acquisition were positively correlated between valence categories in both experimental groups ( r s > .4), thus supporting the idea of an underlying trait of general ‘conditionability’ or reinforcement sensitivity (Corr, 2004). However, pupil responses to the CS+ app did not show a coherent pattern of associations with subjective judgments as well as with SCRs (see Supplemental Results for detailed results of exploratory correlational analyses).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This acquisition of conditioned responses to many CSs after only a single learning block in which all CS-US pairs are presented is the key feature of this stimulus set that makes it useful for experiments that also involve assessments of episodic memory, as stimulus repetitions often need to be kept minimal to avoid memories from getting too strong, or more semantic in nature (McClelland et al, 1995). Although 'episodic conditioning' was successful for negative USs, it was not for positive USs, which is a fairly typical pattern of results for studies investigating both aversive and appetitive conditioning in humans (Exner et al, 2021;Hermann et al, 2000;Stussi et al, 2018). One reason for this may be that the unconditioned responses to positive stimuli were on all measures substantially smaller than those to negative stimuli were on the pupil and corrugator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Unpleasant (and, less consistently, high arousing, in contrast to low arousing pleasant) pictures have been found to evoke more pronounced initial HR deceleration, whereas pleasant pictures provoked higher acceleration relative to unpleasant [neutral pictures ranging in between; (30,32)]. In line with these findings, evidence from appetitive and aversive conditioning suggest, that initial bradycardia might be rather valence-independent, indicating stimulus novelty or significance (33,34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%