Cardiac T1 and T2 Mapping Showed Myocardial Involvement in Recovered COVID‐19 Patients Initially Considered Devoid of Cardiac Damage

Abstract

Background Myocardial injury has been found using magnetic resonance imaging in recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patients unselected or with ongoing cardiac symptoms. Purpose To evaluate for the presence of myocardial involvement in recovered COVID‐19 patients without cardiovascular symptoms and abnormal serologic markers during hospitalization. Study Type Prospective. Population Twenty‐one recovered COVID‐19 patients and 20 healthy controls (HC). Field Strength/Sequence 3.0 T, cine, T2‐weighted imaging, T1 mapping, and T2 mapping. Assessment Cardiac ventricular function includes end‐diastolic volume, end‐systolic volume, stroke volume, cardiac output, left ventricle (LV) mass, and ejection fraction (EF) of LV and right ventricle (RV), and segmental myocardial T1 and T2 values were measured. Statistical Tests Student's t ‐test, univariate general linear model test, and chi‐square test were used for analyses between two groups. Ordinary one‐way analyses of variance or Kruskal–Wallis H test were used for analyses between three groups, followed by post‐hoc analyses. Results Fifteen (71.43%) COVID‐19 patients had abnormal magnetic resonance findings, including raised myocardial native T1 (5, 23.81%) and T2 values (10, 47.62%), decreased LVEF (1, 4.76%), and RVEF (2, 9.52%). The segmental myocardial T2 value of COVID‐19 patients (49.20 [46.1, 54.6] msec) was significantly higher than HC (48.3 [45.2, 51.7] msec) ( P < 0.001), while the myocardial native T1 value showed no significant difference between COVID‐19 patients and HC. The myocardial T2 value of serious COVID‐19 patients (52.5 [48.1, 57.1] msec) was significantly higher than unserious COVID‐19 patients (48.8 [45.9, 53.8] msec) and HC (48.3 [45.2, 51.7]) ( P < 0.001). COVID‐19 patients with abnormally elevated D‐dimer, C‐reactive protein, or lymphopenia showed higher myocardial T2 values than without (all P < 0.05). Data Conclusion Cardiac involvement was observed in recovered COVID‐19 patients with no preexisting cardiovascular disease, no cardiovascular symptoms, and elevated serologic markers of myocardial injury during the whole course of COVID‐19. Level of Evidence 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 5

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in 2954 COVID‐19 Adult Survivors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

“…Hence, recent studies have assessed the presence of cardiac involvement using MRI, a noninvasive diagnostic tool, in patients infected by SARS‐CoV‐2 after recovery. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 …”

Is cardiac involvement prevalent in highly trained athletes after SARS-CoV-2 infection? A cardiac magnetic resonance study using sex-matched and age-matched controls

“…While the cohort study by Puntmann et al 1 reported a higher prevalence of findings, new studies have shown similar results to ours, although in very different populations. 23 24 McDiarmid et al 25 previously demonstrated that physiological hypertrophy slightly decreased the T1 value among highly trained athletes. We also found that, similar to other CMR parameters, men and women have distinct native T1 and T2 values, which justifies the use of sex-matched control groups when interpreting mapping alterations.…”

COVID-lateral damage: cardiovascular manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection

“…For example, myocardial edema/inflammation seen on cardiac MRI was more common in patients with severe COVID19, compared with non-severe COVID19 and healthy controls. Higher T2 signal reflective of myocardial edema was associated with markers of COVID19 severity such as D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and lymphopenia 163 . Prior history of ischemic heart disease or heart failure were associated with abnormalities on transthoracic echocardiogram in patients with COVID19 144 .…”