2016
DOI: 10.4064/dm748-2-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardinal invariants for $\kappa$-box products: weight, density character and Suslin number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one can ask whether J ( f ) is a filter or whether it has minimal, by inclusion, elements, or even the smallest element. It has been shown by W. Comfort and I. Gotchev in [7][8][9] that the family J ( f ) can have quite a complicated set-theoretic structure, even if X is a Cartesian product of topological spaces and f is a continuous mapping to a space Y. It is worth mentioning that the thorough study of the family J ( f ) was motivated by a somewhat simpler question on whether J ( f ) had a countable element J ⊂ I.…”
Section: More On Continuous Homomorphisms Of P-modifications Of Products and Their Dense Submonoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one can ask whether J ( f ) is a filter or whether it has minimal, by inclusion, elements, or even the smallest element. It has been shown by W. Comfort and I. Gotchev in [7][8][9] that the family J ( f ) can have quite a complicated set-theoretic structure, even if X is a Cartesian product of topological spaces and f is a continuous mapping to a space Y. It is worth mentioning that the thorough study of the family J ( f ) was motivated by a somewhat simpler question on whether J ( f ) had a countable element J ⊂ I.…”
Section: More On Continuous Homomorphisms Of P-modifications Of Products and Their Dense Submonoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one can ask whether J ( f ) is a filter or whether it has minimal, by inclusion, elements, or even the smallest element. It has been shown by W. Comfort and I. Gotchev in [19][20][21] that the family J ( f ) can have quite a complicated set-theoretic structure, even if X is a Cartesian product of topological spaces and f is a continuous mapping to a space Y. It is worth mentioning that the thorough study of the family J ( f ) was motivated by a somewhat simpler question on whether J ( f ) had a countable element J ⊂ I.…”
Section: More On Continuous Homomorphisms Of P-modifications Of Products and Their Dense Submonoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%