Cardio Metabolic Syndrome: A Global Epidemic

Kelli, Heval Mohamed; Kassas, Ibrahim; Lattouf, Omar M.

doi:10.4172/2155-6156.1000513

Cited by 48 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 159 publications

(160 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Risk factors that can lead to cardiometabolic syndrome include high blood pressure or blood sugar, low cholesterol, abnormal heartbeat, and obesity. Cardiometabolic syndrome can result in heart disease, diabetes, and stroke, as well as death (Cannon, 2007; Srivastava, ; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, & Blood Institute, ), and has become a global pandemic (Kelli, Kassas, & Lattouf, ). Given its prominence, it is important to understand how work factors such as WLC might contribute to employee experience of cardiometabolic risk factors, which explains the growing body of research on this topic.…”

Section: Physical and Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work‐life conflict and employee health: A review

Gisler

Alenick

Tumminia

et al. 2018

J Appl Biobehavioral Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The challenge of managing work and nonwork domains is an omnipresent experience for the employed workforce that has meaningful links to psychological, physical, and behavioral health. Work‐life conflict can create tension‐based strain and deplete resources, in turn interfering directly or indirectly with health. In this review, we summarize the empirical literature on work‐life conflict, and the more frequently studied and specific construct of work‐family conflict, as it pertains to employee health. Over three decades of literature inform this review, with more attention devoted to publications from the last 5 years. Trends and gaps in the current literature are identified.

show abstract

Section: Physical and Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work‐life conflict and employee health: A review

Gisler

Alenick

Tumminia

et al. 2018

J Appl Biobehavioral Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Metabolic syndrome can increase the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer and renal insufficiency [5]. From a wide range of physiological disorders, obesity or overweight contributed the biggest factor for the occurrence of metabolic syndrome [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate Intensity Training (MIT) Against TNF-α and IL-6 levels In Rats

Hadiono¹,

Kushartanti²

2019

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sports Sciences and Health 2018 (2nd ICSSH 2018)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of exercise with High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate Intensity Training (MIT) on inflammatory profile of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 on the subject of obesity.This research is used 39 wistar rats of male-sex obesity. Intervention training is given for 6 weeks with frequency 4 times per week, HIIT intensity (90-100% of base line capability), MIT (60-80% of base line capability) TNF-α and IL-6 levels are obtained from blood testing with using ELISA test. Data analysis using Anova test.The results of this study showed that there were differences in levels of TNF-α HIIT with control (P = 0.003), MIT with control (P = 0.001) and no difference between HIIT group and MIT (P = 0.945). There was a difference of IL-6 levels between HIIT and control (P = 0.000), HIIT with MIT (P = 0.002), no difference in MIT group with control (P = 0.747). Exercise with the method of HIIT and MIT for 6 weeks with a frequency of 4 times per week can not create levels of TNF-α on the subject of obesity are lower as compared with sedentary groups, even the levels of TNF-α group of HIIT and MIT were significantly higher compared with the sedentary group. As for the levels of IL-6, HIIT is more effective in influencing the low IL-6 compared to MIT.

show abstract

“…(Kelli et al 2015) Both DIET and PROG groups in this study achieved this goal with weight losses of 7.8 and 11.9%, respectively. One aspect of the success of both treatments was the emphasis on lowering carbohydrate consumption, as low carbohydrate diets tend to exhibit faster weight loss.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%