2012
DOI: 10.4103/1658-354x.97024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing vascular surgery

Abstract: Objectives:The present study was conducted to evaluate the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane compared with propofol in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing peripheral vascular surgery; and to address the question whether a volatile anesthetic might improve cardiac outcome in these patients.Methods:One hundred twenty-six patients scheduled for elective peripheral vascular surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia or total intravenous anesthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of studies enrolling over 6,200 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery did not find myocardial infarction or death in the studies reviewed, which limited analysis of choice of anesthetic technique impact on clinically relevant outcomes [120]. However, Bassuoni et al reported a beneficial effect of VA administration compared to propofol anesthesia [121]. They found VA administration was associated with less myocardial ischemia and troponin release after noncardiac peripheral vascular surgery in a study of 126 patients who did not have significant additional comorbid conditions.Recommendations from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines that state that patients at risk for myocardial infarction during non-cardiac surgery would benefit from pretreatment with gas anesthesia, if hemodynamically stable [122].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of studies enrolling over 6,200 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery did not find myocardial infarction or death in the studies reviewed, which limited analysis of choice of anesthetic technique impact on clinically relevant outcomes [120]. However, Bassuoni et al reported a beneficial effect of VA administration compared to propofol anesthesia [121]. They found VA administration was associated with less myocardial ischemia and troponin release after noncardiac peripheral vascular surgery in a study of 126 patients who did not have significant additional comorbid conditions.Recommendations from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines that state that patients at risk for myocardial infarction during non-cardiac surgery would benefit from pretreatment with gas anesthesia, if hemodynamically stable [122].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, foreign clinical studies have shown that9 a reasonable adjustment of the anesthesia maintenance drug program can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative POCD and reduce damage to central nervous system function. Cell culture experiments confirm that10,11 volatile anesthetics (isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane) can induce apoptosis and increase the formation of beta-amyloid protein. Similarly, with the increase of desflurane dosage, the degree of oligomerization of beta-amyloid protein also increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For example in the study conducted by Parker et al 19 and Bennett et al, 41 it was shown the protective effect in sevoflurane and isoflurane was similar and no changes were observed in troponin levels using the two drugs. Two studies 28,42 reported that sevoflurane provides better hemodynamic and protective conditions in the heart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%