2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiorespiratory fitness and development of abdominal obesity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 indicates that the non-abdominally obese group had significantly higher results for all physical fitness tests among both men and women. These results are generally consistent with those of previous studies [8,[10][11][12][13]. Table 3 presents the odds ratios (ORs) of each physical fitness measurement in relation to abdominal obesity after adjustment for potential confounders.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 indicates that the non-abdominally obese group had significantly higher results for all physical fitness tests among both men and women. These results are generally consistent with those of previous studies [8,[10][11][12][13]. Table 3 presents the odds ratios (ORs) of each physical fitness measurement in relation to abdominal obesity after adjustment for potential confounders.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Future studies should be conducted on participants of different ages, different races, and different cultures (lifestyles). Second, although WC has been reported to be a reliable indicator for abdominal obesity [7][8][9][11][12][13][14], the discrimination between abdominal obesity and general obesity cannot be guaranteed. It is also limiting to use these measurements to predict subcutaneous and visceral fat in terms of fitness-abdominal associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, individuals with overweight or obesity problems were found to have a 1.1 to 1.6 times higher risk of low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness for men, with a 1.1 to almost 3 times higher risk for women. As expected, this result is supported by recent research [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Disease risk prediction is closely associated with CRF in apparently healthy individuals, individuals with risk, and individuals already diagnosed with one or more chronic conditions [ 10 14 ]. There are various proven relationships between CRF and respiratory functions [ 15 19 ], physiological [ 20 ], and physical factors [ 21 , 22 ], smoking [ 23 , 24 ], physical activity [ 25 28 ], and anthropometric variables [ 29 ]. Factors such as body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, fat percentage, blood pressure (BP), smoking, and diabetes inversely affect CRF, while respiratory functions and physical activity positively affect CRF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%