2000
DOI: 10.1017/s095806700002008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular effects of 8 h of isocapnic hypoxia with and without beta-blockade in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustained hypoxia of 8 h duration induced a rise in HR under subsequent euoxic conditions and a rise in the sensitivity of HR to acute hypoxia that was similar to that reported in previous studies (Clar et al 2000; Clar et al 2001). Much of this was abrogated with the acute infusion of trimetaphan in Protocol T, consistent with the previous report that much of the change in HR following sustained hypoxia arises through alterations in parasympathetic function (Clar et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sustained hypoxia of 8 h duration induced a rise in HR under subsequent euoxic conditions and a rise in the sensitivity of HR to acute hypoxia that was similar to that reported in previous studies (Clar et al 2000; Clar et al 2001). Much of this was abrogated with the acute infusion of trimetaphan in Protocol T, consistent with the previous report that much of the change in HR following sustained hypoxia arises through alterations in parasympathetic function (Clar et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As there was no euoxia control protocol in the study design, in theory it is possible that there is a significant ‘time of day’ effect incorporated within the acclimatization effect. In practice we have conducted a considerable number of other studies involving 8 h exposures to hypoxia, which have included euoxia control protocols, and in none of these controls have we found a significant time of day effect (Howard & Robbins, 1995; Tansley et al 1997; Fatemian & Robbins, 1998; Clar et al 1999, 2000; Ren et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%