“…As summarized in Figure 3, conscious animal models usually have more repolarization reserve than healthy human volunteers, which may make the models less sensitive for detecting drug‐induced QT interval prolongation ( Sugiyama and Hashimoto, 2002 ; Sakaguchi et al ., 2005 ; Takahara et al ., 2005a , 2005b , 2006b ; Chiba et al ., 2006 ). The extent of repolarization is thought to be similar in healthy human volunteers and halothane‐anaesthetized dogs ( Sugiyama et al ., 1996 , 1997a , 1997b , 1999 , 2001a , 2001b , 2001c and 2001d , 2002c , 2003 , 2004a ; Sugiyama and Hashimoto, 1998 ; Usui et al ., 1998 ; Satoh et al ., 1999 , 2000a , 2000b and 2000c , 2004 , 2005 ; Chiba et al ., 2000 , 2004a , 2004b ; Shiina et al ., 2000 ; Takahara et al ., 2000 , 2003a , 2003b , 2004a , 2005b ; Yoneyama et al ., 2002 ; Yoshida et al ., 2002a ). On the other hand, both high‐risk human patients and chronic atrioventricular (AV) block animals have limited repolarization reserve and elevated inward calcium current; thus, they are most susceptible to drug‐induced QT interval prolongation and subsequent TdP ( Chiba et al ., 2000 , 2004a ; Sugiyama et al ., 2002c , 2003 ; Yoshida et al ., 2002b ; Satoh et al ., 2004 ; Takahara et al ., 2004b , 2006c ).…”