2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-018-1371-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of cardiac morphology and function: impact of different strategies of contour drawing and indexing

Abstract: Quantitative assessment of LV volumes and mass with inclusion of papillary muscles and trabeculae to myocardial mass resulted in significantly different values, while indexing to BSA and not height may miss LV hypertrophy in terms of overweight.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c) LV mass i) Calculation: difference between the total epicardial volume (sum of epicardial crosssectional areas multiplied by the sum of the slice thickness and interslice gap) minus the total endocardial volume (sum of endocardial crosssectional areas multiplied by the sum of the slice thickness and interslice gap), which is then multiplied by the specific density of myocardium (1.05 g/ml). ii) Papillary muscles: Papillary muscles and trabecular tissue are myocardial tissue and thus ideally should be included with the myocardium as part of LV mass, and this is particularly relevant in diseases with LV hypertrophy [6]. However, readers may decide to exclude trabecular tissue and papillary muscles from the myocardial mass.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c) LV mass i) Calculation: difference between the total epicardial volume (sum of epicardial crosssectional areas multiplied by the sum of the slice thickness and interslice gap) minus the total endocardial volume (sum of endocardial crosssectional areas multiplied by the sum of the slice thickness and interslice gap), which is then multiplied by the specific density of myocardium (1.05 g/ml). ii) Papillary muscles: Papillary muscles and trabecular tissue are myocardial tissue and thus ideally should be included with the myocardium as part of LV mass, and this is particularly relevant in diseases with LV hypertrophy [6]. However, readers may decide to exclude trabecular tissue and papillary muscles from the myocardial mass.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, corresponding to the LV all myocardial tissue should be regarded as part of myocardium. In a previous study we observed significant differences between LV stroke volumes and RV stroke volumes only when papillary muscles and trabeculae were excluded from LV-M supporting this theory [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In a previous study, we already could show that trabeculae and papillary muscles have a significant impact on the quantification of LV volumes and mass, while the inclusion of all myocardial tissue in LV-M appears advantageous. Additionally, LV-M should better be indexed to height instead of body surface area (BSA) to avoid bias in overweight subjects [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMR was performed in a supine position a 1.5 T CMR system (Ingenia™, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands), with a commercial cardiac phased-array receiver coil as previously described [ 23 , 24 ]. Details of acquisition and post-processing are available in the Additional file 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%