2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-4034-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular, muscular, and skeletal adaptations to recreational team handball training: a randomized controlled trial with young adult untrained men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
27
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
12
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This was addressed in a later study, showing that team handball training induced positive physical fitness and health‐related adaptations for adult men with previous experience with team handball . Besides, two studies conducted by our research group have already observed that small‐sided team handball led to positive effects on cardiovascular, musculo‐skeletal, and metabolic fitness in untrained young adult men and women . However, the group of young adult women did not show any effects on the cardiovascular outcomes, which may partly have been influenced by their overall superior baseline cardiovascular risk profile, since the intensity during training was high and the work produced was of intermittent nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This was addressed in a later study, showing that team handball training induced positive physical fitness and health‐related adaptations for adult men with previous experience with team handball . Besides, two studies conducted by our research group have already observed that small‐sided team handball led to positive effects on cardiovascular, musculo‐skeletal, and metabolic fitness in untrained young adult men and women . However, the group of young adult women did not show any effects on the cardiovascular outcomes, which may partly have been influenced by their overall superior baseline cardiovascular risk profile, since the intensity during training was high and the work produced was of intermittent nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The popularity of this sport has increased in recent years, and currently, there are an estimated 25 million players worldwide [2], including male, female, senior, and youth players [3]. Despite the multiple beneficial effects derived from handball practice, such as improvements in cardiovascular, metabolic, muscular and psychosocial health [4][5][6], this team sport presents a high injury risk [7], mainly due to its high-intensity specific demands (i.e., rapid changes of direction, jumps with abrupt landings and repetitive throws, as well as frequent physical contact among players [8,9]). Likewise, low physical fitness, incorrect technique, lack of flexibility, and also inadequate rehabilitation treatment of injuries have been reported as risk factors related to the occurrence of injuries [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…December 2015. The primary outcome variable of the overall study was VO 2peak , as described by Hornstrup and colleagues [24,25]. Sample size estimates were based on the expected standard deviations of changes in the main outcomes of VO 2peak and body-composition previously reported following recreational small-sided football training in untrained individuals [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the many intense actions during small-sided recreational football are the main cause for the observed positive adaptations in musculoskeletal function [10,[21][22][23]. Notably, recreational small-sided team handball match-play has shown similar patterns of intermittent movements and activity changes as reported in small-sided football play [21,[24][25][26]]. Yet, only few studies have investigated the physical adaptations to small-sided team handball training with no investigations into the potential effect of small-sided team handball training on musculoskeletal fitness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation