Cardiovascular Responses to Resistance Exercise Performed with Large and Small Muscle Mass

Matos-Santos, Lenifran; Farinatti, Paulo; Borges, Juliana Pereira; Massaferri, Renato; Monteiro, Walace David

doi:10.1055/s-0043-116671

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…to-rest ratio or insufficient resting time between repetitions or groups of repetitions [23], the total mass involved [32], the type of exercise, including or not Valsalva manoeuvres, and the higher differences in the intensity of effort managed (reaching or not the muscle failure), might account for the discrepancies between our findings and the literature as these factors can module the BP response. Particularly, the latter reason is paramount as the management of the end of the set would provoke differences in physiological demand [11][12][13] and peak BP values.…”

Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting

confidence: 81%

Hemodynamic Response During Different Set Configurations of a Moderate-load Resistance Exercise

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We aimed to determine the cardiovascular responses to two different set configuration resistance-exercise protocols during a knee extension composed of 40 repetitions with a 15RM load and a total resting time of 360 seconds. Twenty-four healthy sport science students randomly performed two sessions: (a) a long set configuration session (LSC: 4 sets of 10 repetitions with 2 min rest between sets) and (b) a short set configuration session (SSC: 8 sets of 5 repetitions with 51 s rest between sets). Before and during exercise, peak and mean values of heart rate, blood pressure, rate pressure product, and pulse pressure were obtained. Results showed that both protocols increased the overall peak and mean blood pressure values (p < 0.001). However, LSC entailed a higher peak blood pressure response at the last set (p = 0.041) and an increase throughout the first 30 repetitions (p ≤ 0.007), while SSC kept steady after the first 20 repetitions. Additionally, LSC caused higher overall peak and mean heart rate and rate pressure product values (p ≤ 0.003). Summarily, although both protocols raised blood pressure, SSC reduced the extent of the pressure and chronotropic response during resistance exercise

show abstract

Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting

confidence: 81%

Hemodynamic Response During Different Set Configurations of a Moderate-load Resistance Exercise

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, arterial remodeling was found predominantly in exercising muscles that contribute to "ascending vasodilatory" responses in the vasculature [24]. The increase of blood velocity in the core group might reflect the higher resting Also, exercising with larger muscle mass was found associated longer parasympathetic dominance [25], all of which suggested the extent to which vasodilatory responses induced by walking exercise would be greater than core exercise after training. Therefore, it might not be surprising that the walking group not only significantly increased femoral blood flow, but also femoral artery compliance, and systemic arterial stiffness (baPWV) independent of blood pressure and metabolic biomarker changes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Homebased Standing Core Exercise Training Improves Femoral Blood Flow but not Arterial Stiffness in Middle-Aged to Older Adults

Lin¹,

Wang²,

Cheng³

et al. 2021

ARTRES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Homebased exercise is often advocated to improve physical fitness in the aging population, especially when outdoor activity is not available. Yet we often have a limited understanding of its training effects for clinical uses.Aim: To investigate a short-term exercise training of standing core exercise on femoral blood flow and vascular hemodynamic changes in middle-aged to the older population.Methods: A total of 34 middle-aged to older adults were recruited and randomly assigned into walking (M/F = 6/7, age = 66 ± 3 years), core exercise (M/F = 6/6, age = 66 ± 2 years), and the control group (M/F = 4/5, age = 70 ± 3 years). Carotid and brachial blood pressure, Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) and Brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV), femoral blood flow and compliance, leg hemodynamics, as well as aerobic and muscular fitness (30 s arm curl and sit-to-stand test) were measured pre and post 8 weeks of exercise training (60-70% HRmax, three sessions/week).Results: Core exercise group significantly increased femoral blood flow, but not overall vascular functions; arm muscle endurance and leg power performance were also significantly improved after training. The walking group significantly reduced baPWV, leg resistance, as well as increase femoral blood flow and compliance after training. Compared with the control, the core group elicited a higher femoral blood blow, whereas leg resistance was significantly reduced in the walking group after training. Conclusion:A short-term standing core training appears to augment femoral blood flow and muscular fitness in middle-aged to older adults, yet walking is more effective in improving overall vascular health in this population.

show abstract

“…high load/low repetition or low load/high repetition) has a significant influence on the amount of cardiovascular exertion during and after exercise 17 , 18 . Moreover, the amount of exercised muscle mass (comparing different strength exercises) has an impact on cardiovascular response in strength training 19 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although strength training has grown increasingly popular in recent decades and regular strength training’s long-term effects have been widely documented 23 – 27 , the acute cardiopulmonary response moreover is often only investigated by relying on standard parameters like heart rate and oxygen uptake. Hemodynamic parameters have been primarily analyzed in conjunction with endurance training 28 , 29 and seldom in strength training, whereby the few studies differ regarding the comparison groups in intensity, number of repetitions 17 , 18 , or used muscle mass 19 . Gjovaag et al compared high load/low repetition resistance training (RT) to low load/high repetition RT and found significant different blood pressure and cardiac output responses during and after exercise.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gjovaag et al compared high load/low repetition resistance training (RT) to low load/high repetition RT and found significant different blood pressure and cardiac output responses during and after exercise. Also, during different strength exercises, the involved muscle mass showed different hemodynamic responses 19 . However, to date, there has been no investigation comparing the acute hemodynamic response in standardized strength training with the same number of repetitions at different intensities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intensity-dependent cardiopulmonary response during and after strength training

Lässing

Maudrich

Kenville

et al. 2023

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whereas cardiopulmonary responses are well understood in endurance training, they are rarely described in strength training. This cross-over study examined acute cardiopulmonary responses in strength training. Fourteen healthy male strength training-experienced participants (age 24.5 ± 2.9 years; BMI 24.1 ± 2.0 kg/m2) were randomly assigned into three strength training sessions (three sets of ten repetitions) with different intensities (50%, 62,5%, and 75% of the 3-Repetition Maximum) of squats in a smith machine. Cardiopulmonary (impedance cardiography, ergo-spirometry) responses were continuously monitored. During exercise period, heart rate (HR 143 ± 16 vs. 132 ± 15 vs. 129 ± 18 bpm, respectively; p < 0.01; η2p 0.54) and cardiac output (CO: 16.7 ± 3.7 vs. 14.3 ± 2.5 vs. 13.6 ± 2.4 l/min, respectively; p < 0.01; η2p 0.56) were higher at 75% of 3-RM compared to those at the other intensities. We noted similar stroke volume (SV: p = 0.08; η2p 0.18) and end-diastolic volume (EDV: p = 0.49). Ventilation (VE) was higher at 75% compared to 62.5% and 50% (44.0 ± 8.0 vs. 39.6 ± 10.4 vs. 37.6 ± 7.7 l/min, respectively; p < 0.01; η2p 0.56). Respiration rate (RR; p = .16; η2p 0.13), tidal volume (VT: p = 0.41; η2p 0.07) and oxygen uptake (VO2: p = 0.11; η2p 0.16) did not differ between intensities. High systolic and diastolic blood pressure were evident (62.5% 3-RM 197 ± 22.4/108.8 ± 13.4 mmHG). During the post-exercise period (60 s), SV, CO, VE, VO2, and VCO2 were higher (p < 0.01) than during the exercise period, and the pulmonary parameters differed markedly between intensities (VE p < 0.01; RR p < 0.01; VT p = 0.02; VO2 p < 0.01; VCO2 p < 0.01). Despite the differences in strength training intensity, the cardiopulmonary response reveals significant differences predominantly during the post-exercise period. Intensity-induced breath holding induces high blood pressure peaks and cardiopulmonary recovery effects after exercise.

show abstract

Cardiovascular Responses to Resistance Exercise Performed with Large and Small Muscle Mass

Cited by 10 publications

References 41 publications

Hemodynamic Response During Different Set Configurations of a Moderate-load Resistance Exercise

Hemodynamic Response During Different Set Configurations of a Moderate-load Resistance Exercise

Homebased Standing Core Exercise Training Improves Femoral Blood Flow but not Arterial Stiffness in Middle-Aged to Older Adults

Intensity-dependent cardiopulmonary response during and after strength training

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About