Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objective: This article analyzes anesthesia strategies for cardiovascular patients, highlighting challenges and advances. The review evaluates the effectiveness of approaches like continuous hemodynamic monitoring and personalized plans in reducing perioperative complications. It also proposes measures to overcome implementation barriers, emphasizing the need for integrated health policies and innovative technologies to improve outcomes and reduce mortality. Theoretical Framework: Effective management of anesthesia in patients with cardiovascular diseases is crucial due to the increasing global prevalence of these conditions and their association with severe complications such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, and thromboembolic events. Method: A narrative literature review was conducted using major scientific databases to collect articles on anesthesia management for cardiovascular patients. Key studies were evaluated to measure the effectiveness of continuous hemodynamic monitoring and personalized plans. Specific keywords helped identify research on challenges and advances, allowing for synthesis of effective strategies and identification of implementation gaps. Results and Discussion: The review found that continuous hemodynamic monitoring and personalized anesthesia plans reduce perioperative complications in cardiovascular patients, significantly decreasing myocardial infarction, heart failure, and thromboembolic events. Implementation barriers include limited access to specialized services and managing patients with multiple comorbidities. Improving access to specialized care, continuously training healthcare professionals, and developing integrated policies and innovative technologies are essential for better diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, reducing perioperative mortality.
Objective: This article analyzes anesthesia strategies for cardiovascular patients, highlighting challenges and advances. The review evaluates the effectiveness of approaches like continuous hemodynamic monitoring and personalized plans in reducing perioperative complications. It also proposes measures to overcome implementation barriers, emphasizing the need for integrated health policies and innovative technologies to improve outcomes and reduce mortality. Theoretical Framework: Effective management of anesthesia in patients with cardiovascular diseases is crucial due to the increasing global prevalence of these conditions and their association with severe complications such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, and thromboembolic events. Method: A narrative literature review was conducted using major scientific databases to collect articles on anesthesia management for cardiovascular patients. Key studies were evaluated to measure the effectiveness of continuous hemodynamic monitoring and personalized plans. Specific keywords helped identify research on challenges and advances, allowing for synthesis of effective strategies and identification of implementation gaps. Results and Discussion: The review found that continuous hemodynamic monitoring and personalized anesthesia plans reduce perioperative complications in cardiovascular patients, significantly decreasing myocardial infarction, heart failure, and thromboembolic events. Implementation barriers include limited access to specialized services and managing patients with multiple comorbidities. Improving access to specialized care, continuously training healthcare professionals, and developing integrated policies and innovative technologies are essential for better diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, reducing perioperative mortality.
Background: The use of beta-blockers in the perioperative period has been widely investigated due to their potential to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality; yet their overall impact on various postoperative outcomes remains debated. This study constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of beta-blockers on mortality, MI, stroke, and other adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases; we included randomized controlled trials and cohort and case-control studies published from 1999 to 2024. Results: This meta-analysis included data from 28 studies encompassing 1,342,430 patients. Perioperative beta-blockers were associated with a significant increase in stroke risk (RR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.97, p = 0.03, I2 = 62%). However, no statistically significant association was found between beta-blocker use and mortality (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.01, p = 0.05, I2 = 100%). Subgroup analyses revealed a protective effect on mortality for patients with high risks, such as patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure, and other arrhythmias. For myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.28, p = 0.36, I2 = 86%), a reduction in events was observed in the subgroup of randomized controlled trials. Beta-blockers significantly increased the risk of hypotension (RR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.70, p < 0.01, I2 = 25%) and bradycardia (RR 2.26, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.74, p < 0.01, I2 = 64%). Conclusion: Perioperative beta-blockers show increasing rates of stroke events following non-cardiac surgery but do not significantly impact the incidence of MI or mortality. The increased risks of hypotension and bradycardia necessitate careful patient selection and monitoring. Future research should aim to refine patient selection criteria and optimize perioperative management to balance the benefits and risks of beta-blocker use in surgical settings.
Objective: To provide insights into how a proactive, risk-focused nursing intervention model canenhance recovery outcomes and quality of life of vulnerable elderly population. Methods: Keyevaluation indicators included Time to First Ambulation, Pain Levels (measured using the Visual AnalogScale and Numerical Rating Scale); Complications; and Daily Living Ability. Results: The observationgroup demonstrated superior recovery outcomes compared to the control group, achieving earlierambulation, quicker suture removals, and shorter hospital stays. Notably, primary wound healingrates were significantly higher in the observation group. Post-intervention, both groups experienceda significant reduction in pain scores measured by VAS and NRS, with the observation group showinga more substantial decrease. Additionally, improvements were observed in both the Barthel Index (BI)and SF-36 scores; however, the observation group achieved notably better results. The complicationrate in the observation group was significantly lower at 6.67%, compared to 17.33% in the control group(all, P<0.05). Conclusion: Integrating comprehensive risk management nursing into the postoperativecare of elderly orthopaedic patients enhances recovery, optimizes pain management, improves dailyfunction and quality of life and reduces complication rates compared to traditional nursing methods.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.