2017
DOI: 10.3224/feminapolitica.v26i2.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Care-Arbeit politisieren: Herausforderungen der (Selbst-)Organisierung von migrantischen 24h-Betreuerinnen

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the example of live‐in elderly care in Switzerland, she illustrates how migrant care workers (discursively and through their everyday practices) resist the assumed corruption of their caregiving through its monetarisation. In a similar vein, authors challenge the framing of domestic workers as passive victims and demonstrate how they actively shape their life trajectories (Schwiter, Strauss, & England, 2018; Strüver, 2013) and organise and campaign for better working conditions (Ally, 2005; Chau, Pelzelmayer, & Schwiter, 2018; England, 2017; Pratt & Migrante, 2018; Schilliger & Schilling, 2017).…”
Section: The Commodification Of Care and The Emergence Of Globalised mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the example of live‐in elderly care in Switzerland, she illustrates how migrant care workers (discursively and through their everyday practices) resist the assumed corruption of their caregiving through its monetarisation. In a similar vein, authors challenge the framing of domestic workers as passive victims and demonstrate how they actively shape their life trajectories (Schwiter, Strauss, & England, 2018; Strüver, 2013) and organise and campaign for better working conditions (Ally, 2005; Chau, Pelzelmayer, & Schwiter, 2018; England, 2017; Pratt & Migrante, 2018; Schilliger & Schilling, 2017).…”
Section: The Commodification Of Care and The Emergence Of Globalised mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wie die Regulierungschronologie indes zeigt, führt die seit Jahren beständig geübte Kritik (vgl. auch Chau et al 2018;Schilliger und Schilling 2017) nicht dazu, dass das Modell grundsätzlich neu verhandelt wird. Durch eine legitimationssoziologische Brille lässt sich sodann beobachten, dass den als Kritikprinzipien funktionierenden Gerechtigkeitsansprüchen pragmatische Rationalitätsansprüche gegenüberstehen, die das Arrangement legitimieren und stabilisieren.…”
Section: «Es Treibt Dann Einfach Den Preis Hoch»: Das Sparpolitische unclassified