“…However, this has unintended consequences of a less tolerant approach towards individuals most at risk, and a resulting increase in vulnerability and state intervention (Cross, Bywaters, Brown, & Featherstone, 2021). Adopting an instrumental approach fails on both levels: the crisis shows no sign of abating and the numbers of children at risk in England continue to rise (Holt & Kelly, 2019). Significantly, this approach fails to appropriately meet the complex needs of hard to reach children and their families, who are the group most likely to be impacted by digital exclusion, but with increased use of digital surveillance – digital use for many children and their families is a marriage made in hell.…”