Care towards posttraumatic growth in the era of digital economy

Brown, Alison; Choi, Jaz Hee-jeong; Shakespeare‐Finch, Jane

doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1631350

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 59 , 72 , 106 The development of creative digital approaches includes the following: online communities, digitization and redesign of psychology interventions, biometrics and data‐driven approaches, creative sharing of stories, symbolic engagements, and creative offerings of comfort and encouragements of self‐care. 169 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI‐assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice

Zidaru

Morrow²,

Stockley

2021

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Machine‐learning algorithms and big data analytics, popularly known as ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI), are being developed and taken up globally. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in the transition to AI‐assisted health care is essential for design justice based on diverse patient needs. Objective To inform the future development of PPI in AI‐assisted health care by exploring public engagement in the conceptualization, design, development, testing, implementation, use and evaluation of AI technologies for mental health. Methods Systematic scoping review drawing on design justice principles, and (i) structured searches of Web of Science (all databases) and Ovid (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Global Health and Embase); (ii) handsearching (reference and citation tracking); (iii) grey literature; and (iv) inductive thematic analysis, tested at a workshop with health researchers. Results The review identified 144 articles that met inclusion criteria. Three main themes reflect the challenges and opportunities associated with PPI in AI‐assisted mental health care: (a) applications of AI technologies in mental health care; (b) ethics of public engagement in AI‐assisted care; and (c) public engagement in the planning, development, implementation, evaluation and diffusion of AI technologies. Conclusion The new data‐rich health landscape creates multiple ethical issues and opportunities for the development of PPI in relation to AI technologies. Further research is needed to understand effective modes of public engagement in the context of AI technologies, to examine pressing ethical and safety issues and to develop new methods of PPI at every stage, from concept design to the final review of technology in practice. Principles of design justice can guide this agenda.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI‐assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice

Zidaru

Morrow²,

Stockley

2021

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, the role of co-design in developing platforms has been discussed, in confronting the hegemony of platform capitalism, where the collaboration of many is turned into profits by the platform owners (Srnicek 2017;Avram et al 2019). Digital platforms have permeated society, rendering services efficiently; however, their neo-liberal values have been questioned (Brown, Choi, and Shakespeare-Finch 2019). Instead of platform capitalism, the co-design community has supported alternatives, such as platform collectivism, being mutual beneficial for stakeholders (Carroll and Beck 2019).…”

Section: Co-design In the Era Of Platformsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Local tech mediators - a human access point to global crowdfunding platforms

Keskinen

Arvila

Winschiers‐Theophilus

et al. 2021

CoDesign

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite much criticism, global digital platforms hold some promise for small-scale entrepreneurs (SSEs) in the global south. However, they are often excluded from direct participation in global initiatives, such as crowdfunding. Besides socio-cultural disparities, accessibility and adoption issues, technology usage and integration present a major challenge. To bridge those gaps we propose a workable model consisting of a local tech mediator operating on a digital platform connecting local SSE to global digital services. We have engaged a group of informal settlement SSE in Windhoek, Namibia to jointly conceptualise the roles, tasks and responsibilities of a local tech mediator, concurrently with technical skills training as well as the development of an international crowdfunding campaign. We assert that the jointly developed concepts of a local instantiation of the model as well as the co-design process have enabled us to create model, which would allow the utilisation of global digital platforms for SSEs in the global south.

show abstract

“…In platform capitalism, capital disciplines cooperation via the commodification of social interactions and common goods that are incorporated in many contemporary ICT tools (e.g. dating apps, but also mental health support platforms, see Brown et al 2019). This reality reflects an often unarticulated and thus unchallenged alignment with capital accumulation, which highlights the increasing relevance of digitally manipulated data for exploitation and generation of financial profit (Srnicek 2016).…”

Section: Understanding Platform Capitalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All these approaches propose that digital technologies reconfigure social cooperation and in some cases promote more democratic perspectives, being focused on ethical issues and on the risk of the exploitative affordances of technologies themselves (e.g. Ehn 2008;Friedman and Kahn 2007;Brown et al 2019). One of the main differences between these approaches is in the relation established between the IT researcher/s and the people involved in technology design, development and use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-designing for common values: creating hybrid spaces to nurture autonomous cooperation

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper concerns the development of digitally-mediated technologies that value social cooperation as a common good rather than as a source of revenue and accumulation. The paper discusses the activities that shaped a European participatory design project which aims to develop a digital space that promotes and facilitates the 'Commonfare', a complementary approach to social welfare. The paper provides and discusses concrete examples of design artifacts to address a key question about the role of co-and participatory design in developing hybrid spaces that nurture sharing and autonomous cooperation: how can co-design practices promote alternatives to the commodification of digitallymediated cooperation? The paper argues for a need to focus on relational, social, political and ethical values, and highlights the potential power of co-and participatory design processes to achieve this. In summary, the paper proposes that only by reasserting the centrality of shared values and capacities, rather than individual needs or problems, co-design can reposition itself thereby encouraging autonomous cooperation.

show abstract

Care towards posttraumatic growth in the era of digital economy

Cited by 8 publications

References 34 publications

Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI‐assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice

Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI‐assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice

Local tech mediators - a human access point to global crowdfunding platforms

Co-designing for common values: creating hybrid spaces to nurture autonomous cooperation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About