Caregiver assisted home-based cognitive remediation for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia: A pilot study

Kumar, Deepak; Ashwini, Kundapur; Hegde, Shantala; Prasanna, Lavanya Tumkur; Joseph, Boban; Bose, Anushree; Nawani, Hema; Bharath, Rose Dawn; Varambally, Shivarama; Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan; Gangadhar, Bangalore N.

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2019.03.010

Cited by 13 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This presentation of the data showed that FCCC is most effective in improving patient outcomes. [ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ] Several quotations supporting participants’ experiences were unclear because they were rarely accompanied by references to the source or context of the examples, and quotations were unclear whether they came from patients with psychosis, caregivers, or health system staff in this mixed-methods and qualitative study. [ 50 51 ]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[ 14 16 18 22 34 36 40 45 46 50 ] These studies failed to analyze possible bias when integrating FCCC with other psychotherapeutic or psychosocial interventions. Most primary studies indicated FCCC requested involving caregivers in supporting the individual at home,[ 14 15 16 19 22 35 37 38 39 41 44 47 48 50 ] However, other studies did not mention the need for FS. Several RCTs were single blind; allocation concealment[ 14 35 ] or outcome assessor blinding[ 15 41 ] was done appropriately in these RCTs, although eight numbers of RCTs were double-checked blindly with allocation concealment and outcome assessor blinding[ 16 19 39 40 43 44 45 46 ] and the rest of them were not checked blindly.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the various study designs, the FCCC or family intervention structure was ambiguous or not clearly described. [ 16 20 22 34 35 36 37 40 45 46 47 48 50 51 ] Fisher, Kidd, Asher, Kaselionyte, et al . effectively integrated different components of mixed methods studies to answer the research question.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Family-centered collaborative care for patients with chronic mental illness: A systematic review

Shahriari

Dehbozorgi

Fereidooni-Moghadam

et al. 2023

Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Chronic mental illnesses (CMI) are long lasting and reoccurring and require continuous care as well as an integrated and collaborative approach to organize the care. This study sought to examine whether family centered collaborative care is an acceptable treatment option for individuals with CMI. Materials and Methods: From the years 2000 to 2021, ten electronic databases relating to family centered collaborative care for mental illness were searched adopting Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis checklist. Twenty seven relevant articles and a thesis from among 6956 studies retrieved, were assessed their quality appraisal through four standardized tools. The studies were rated as good, moderate, or poor. Studies were calibrated, different opinions were discussed, and extracted data were done. Results: Evidence included 11 randomized controlled trials (from 19 articles), one randomized control trial, three mixed methods studies (from 3 articles and 1 thesis), and a qualitative study (from 4 articles). The quality of seven studies was good, 15 were moderate quality, and seven were poor quality. According to moderate to high quality qualitative research, family centered collaborative care was considered an acceptable intervention; though a few studies supported it. Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that family involvement in the care of patients with CMI affects no recurrence of the disease, and no re hospitalization of patients with this disorder. As a result, engaging family members in the care process can have a positive impact on the health and well being of these patients.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Family-centered collaborative care for patients with chronic mental illness: A systematic review

Shahriari

Dehbozorgi

Fereidooni-Moghadam

et al. 2023

Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Caregivers are patients' family members or intimate friends who support and take care of them without being paid ( 7 , 8 ). Caregivers can help therapists diagnose the initial symptoms of disease recurrence and cooperate in mental health interventions in patients' care programs ( 9 , 10 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Evidence has indicated that caregivers' participation reduces the need for re-hospitalization, enhances the life quality of patients, and decreases the risk of recurrence of severe mental disorders ( 10 , 15 ). However, this goal has not been achieved in numerous clinical services and caregivers are deprived of participation in the treatment process ( 16 – 18 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to family involvement in the care of patients with chronic mental illnesses: A qualitative study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionCaregivers are patients' family members or intimate friends who take care of individuals suffering from chronic mental illnesses without being paid. Evidence has supported the role of family-centered collaborative care in the treatment of patients with chronic mental illnesses. It has also been emphasized by national policies. However, carrying out this type of care is accompanied by challenges in Iran. Considering the importance of family participation in taking care of these patients as well as the necessity to determine its effective factors, the present study aimed to assess the barriers to family involvement in the care of patients with chronic mental illnesses.MethodA conventional content analysis was used to conduct this qualitative study. Thirty four health care providers, patients, and caregivers were interviewed unstructured in-depth face-to-face using purposive sampling. Until saturation of data, sampling and data analysis were conducted simultaneously. Graneheim and Lundman's method was used to record, transcribe, and analyze the interviews.ResultThe results showed that there were many barriers to the collaboration of family in the care of patients with chronic mental illnesses. Accordingly, four main categories and twelve subcategories were extracted from the data as follows: “family-related barriers”, “treatment-related factors”, “disease nature threatening care”, and “mental disease-associated stigma in the society”.ConclusionThe findings presented the barriers to family centers' collaborative care in patients with chronic mental illnesses and the necessary components of family involvement in the care to be used by healthcare managers and policymakers. The reported barriers emphasize the need for the development of structured approaches whose implementation is easy for health care providers, does not require a lot of time and resources, and can improve patient and family outcomes.

show abstract

Delivery of Neuropsychological Interventions for Adult and Older Adult Clinical Populations: An Australian Expert Working Group Clinical Guidance Paper

Wong,

Pike,

Stolwyk

et al. 2023

Neuropsychol Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Delivery of neuropsychological interventions addressing the cognitive, psychological, and behavioural consequences of brain conditions is increasingly recognised as an important, if not essential, skill set for clinical neuropsychologists. It has the potential to add substantial value and impact to our role across clinical settings. However, there are numerous approaches to neuropsychological intervention, requiring different sets of skills, and with varying levels of supporting evidence across different diagnostic groups. This clinical guidance paper provides an overview of considerations and recommendations to help guide selection, delivery, and implementation of neuropsychological interventions for adults and older adults. We aimed to provide a useful source of information and guidance for clinicians, health service managers, policy-makers, educators, and researchers regarding the value and impact of such interventions. Considerations and recommendations were developed by an expert working group of neuropsychologists in Australia, based on relevant evidence and consensus opinion in consultation with members of a national clinical neuropsychology body. While the considerations and recommendations sit within the Australian context, many have international relevance. We include (i) principles important for neuropsychological intervention delivery (e.g. being based on biopsychosocial case formulation and person-centred goals); (ii) a description of clinical competencies important for effective intervention delivery; (iii) a summary of relevant evidence in three key cohorts: acquired brain injury, psychiatric disorders, and older adults, focusing on interventions with sound evidence for improving activity and participation outcomes; (iv) an overview of considerations for sustainable implementation of neuropsychological interventions as ‘core business’; and finally, (v) a call to action.

show abstract

Caregiver assisted home-based cognitive remediation for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia: A pilot study

Cited by 13 publications

References 18 publications

Family-centered collaborative care for patients with chronic mental illness: A systematic review

Family-centered collaborative care for patients with chronic mental illness: A systematic review

Barriers to family involvement in the care of patients with chronic mental illnesses: A qualitative study

Delivery of Neuropsychological Interventions for Adult and Older Adult Clinical Populations: An Australian Expert Working Group Clinical Guidance Paper

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About