2010
DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0b013e3181ce5025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caregiver Efficacy and Efficacy Determinants for Elderly Care Recipients Who Accept Home Respite Care in Taiwan

Abstract: The results of this study should be helpful to decision makers and home support service units in planning and implementing in-home respite care programs and policies in the future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the positive effect of respite care itself in addition to home services was small. Nonetheless, previous studies aimed at identifying the effectiveness of in-home respite care in Taiwan did not examine the impact on caregiver burden (Chen & Chiou, 2015; Chen & Huang, 2010). Other research showed no considerable effects of in-home respite care on caregiver burden (Vandepitte et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the positive effect of respite care itself in addition to home services was small. Nonetheless, previous studies aimed at identifying the effectiveness of in-home respite care in Taiwan did not examine the impact on caregiver burden (Chen & Chiou, 2015; Chen & Huang, 2010). Other research showed no considerable effects of in-home respite care on caregiver burden (Vandepitte et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strengths of this study are as follows: First, compared with previous studies that focused on adult day care or institutional respite care (Neville et al, 2015; Vandepitte et al, 2019), the present study is one of the few studies that assessed the impact of in-home respite care quantitatively. Second, unlike previous research that used a cross-sectional design (Chen & Chiou, 2015; Chen & Huang, 2010), the present study contributed to the literature by using a two-wave panel design and created a comparison group of in-home respite nonusers after propensity score matching. This method supports our findings on the benefits of in-home respite care with great internal validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These encompass the caregiver's senior age (65 years or older), marital status (currently married), chronic health conditions, current and deteriorating health status, along with a long-term commitment to caregiving, spanning a decade or more. Furthermore, the health condition of the older adult care recipient and their proficiency in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scores are also pivotal to the success of respite interventions (8). Strategies aimed at fortifying caregivers' confidence in their care recipients' ability to function independently may decelerate the trajectory of functional decline in elders receiving home care (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%