Caregiver experiences of public services following child trauma exposure: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundMany children in low and middle income countries (LMIC) are exposed to trauma. Contact with public services are a potential influence on parent–child reactions and coping post-trauma. Little is known about how caregivers perceive these interactions.MethodsThe aim of this study was to explore caregivers’ experiences of accessing and interacting with public services post-trauma and perceptions of needed improvements to public services in a LMIC context. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 female caregivers from a high-risk settlement in South Africa after child trauma exposure.ResultsThree themes and seven sub-themes were identified regarding caregivers’ perceptions of interactions with public services post-trauma. The key themes identified related to (1) communication and exchanges with law enforcement, (2) consequences of an under-resourced justice system and (3) importance of communication and empathy in the healthcare system. Interactions with police were often positive. However, caregivers explained that police-family communication post-trauma could be improved and may help to lessen caregiver anxiety and concerns for the child’s safety post-trauma. Caregivers perceived the judicial system to be under-resourced as contact with the judicial system was often protracted and caused child anxiety and distress. Medical treatment was reportedly rushed, with extensive waiting times and little information provided to caregivers regarding the child’s injuries or treatment. Some medical staff were perceived as unsympathetic during the child’s treatment which was found to exacerbate caregiver and child distress post-trauma.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into caregiver experiences of accessing public services following child trauma exposure in a high-risk LMIC context. Public services were perceived as oversubscribed and under-resourced and negative interactions often influenced caregiver responses and appraisals of child safety. Given the impact of poor interactions with public services on families post-trauma, additional research is needed to investigate feasible improvements to public services in LMIC.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13033-018-0190-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Children Witnessing Domestic Violence in the Voice of Health and Social Professionals Dealing with Contrasting Gender Violence

“…Literature has widely shown the WDV psychological consequences on children, resulting in post-traumatic disorders, depression, self-depreciation, problems in school and concentration, low self-esteem, drug or alcohol abuse (in the long term) with a general compromising of individual growth, wellbeing and relational abilities [28][29][30][31].…”

Leveraging the developmental neuroscience of caregiving to promote resilience among youth exposed to adversity

“…Highly related to parental emotion coaching, parental availability for discussion of stressful events may attenuate the impact of adversity exposure on children’s development of symptomatology (Carpenter et al, 2017; Cohodes et al, 2021; Stallard et al, 2001). Parents who report providing children with frequent opportunities to discuss their feelings about recent stress exposure in an age-appropriate manner may buffer children’s development of stress-related psychopathology via direct impacts on the valence of a child’s appraisal of an event (Williamson et al, 2018; Williamson et al, 2018). In addition, parents may affect the content of children’s narratives about their adversity exposure (Fivush et al, 2003), in the service of buffering harmful impacts of adversity on children’s development of symptomatology (Kilmer & Gil-Rivas, 2010).…”