2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Careless response and attrition as sources of bias in online survey assessments of personality traits and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the data collection method was limited to a self-report questionnaire. As the questions involve personality traits and the good deed of pro-environmental behavior, the results, which are derived from the respondents' feedback, may be biased and subjective [93]. Future studies should consider adopting both subjective and objective methods in order to establish a more comprehensive picture of the research subject.…”
Section: Limiations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the data collection method was limited to a self-report questionnaire. As the questions involve personality traits and the good deed of pro-environmental behavior, the results, which are derived from the respondents' feedback, may be biased and subjective [93]. Future studies should consider adopting both subjective and objective methods in order to establish a more comprehensive picture of the research subject.…”
Section: Limiations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task difficulty can be reduced in a number of ways, including keeping surveys short (Johnson et al, 1990), removing superfluous survey questions (Brosnan et al, 2018), using short sentences and simple language (Lenzner, 2014;Lenzner et al, 2011), and avoiding technical terms (Lenzner, 2012(Lenzner, , 2014. Even when these approaches are used, survey respondents face challenges relating to task difficulty and react by taking shortcuts, such as being less careful when responding, paying less attention (Paas et al, 2018;Ward et al, 2017), and not studying in sufficient detail the instructions provided, the questions asked, and the answer options offered (Brosnan et al, 2019). Such shortcuts inevitably reduce survey data quality (Barge & Gehlbach, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies suggest that response validity is related to the personality of the respondent. Among the personality dimensions investigated, those that consistently relate to response validity include conscientiousness, agreeableness, and to a lesser extent, openness to experience (Bowling et al, ; Dunn et al, ; Maniaci and Rogge, ; Ward et al, ). These findings stand to reason given the nature of these personality dimensions (Digman, ; McCrae and Costa, ).…”
Section: Causes Of Response Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%