2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carer burden and dyadic attachment orientations in adult children-older parent dyads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrasting attachment orientations of care recipient and caregiver (e.g. anxious versus avoidant), the presence of dyadic relationships involving adult children caring for their older parents, along with the presence of more insecure attachment styles have been found to predict the caregivers' burden in the context of family caregiving (Romano et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrasting attachment orientations of care recipient and caregiver (e.g. anxious versus avoidant), the presence of dyadic relationships involving adult children caring for their older parents, along with the presence of more insecure attachment styles have been found to predict the caregivers' burden in the context of family caregiving (Romano et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the three dimensions of the interdependence theory mentioned above, findings from research on non-spousal caregiving dyads supported dyadic interdependence. On a first level of evidence for interdependence, research on nonspousal caregiving dyads has shown that good psychological functioning of care recipients, and specific personality traits and intellectual abilities of both caregivers and care recipients (i.e., intrapersonal variables) might impact reciprocal emotional and relational wellbeing of dyad members (Hollis-Sawyer, 2001;Kim et al, 2008;Romano et al, 2020). Moreover, one element of dyadic interdependence strongly reported in a number of studies synthesized in this review was relationship processes (i.e., interpersonal variables) such as communication patterns and dyadic behavioral responses to care may be associated with different levels of dyad members' wellbeing (e.g., quality of life, caregiver burden, depressive symptoms, and relationship quality) (Martini et al, 2001;Heid et al, 2016;Shawler et al, 2018;Bouldin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a cross-sectional observational study, higher levels of psychological distress in care recipients were significantly related to lower levels of quality of life in caregiving daughters, but not vice versa (Kim et al, 2008). In a similar vein, fewer positive emotions and more insecure attachment orientations in older care recipients were associated with higher burden in adult-child caregivers (Romano et al, 2020). Only in one cross-sectional mixed method study, evidence for interdependence suggested that both caregivers' and care recipients' intrapersonal variables such as personality characteristics (e.g., caregiver's neuroticism and care recipient's openness to experience) and fluid intellectual ability (i.e., the ability to solve problems under novel situations) were significantly related to higher relationship quality in both dyad members (Hollis-Sawyer, 2001).…”
Section: Associations Between Intra/interpersonal Variables and Wellb...mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations