2016
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-707596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carfilzomib significantly improves the progression-free survival of high-risk patients in multiple myeloma

Abstract: Key Points KRd has a favorable benefit-risk profile compared with Rd, regardless of baseline cytogenetic risk status, in patients with relapsed MM. KRd improves but does not abrogate the poor prognosis associated with high-risk cytogenetics in patients with relapsed MM.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
84
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…25 This is consistent with the FISH abnormalities used to define "high risk" in other phase 3 studies and analyses [with or without the rare t(14;20) translocation] in patients with MM. 7,9,[11][12][13][14][15] The presence of these abnormalities has previously been shown to be associated with poor outcomes, including poor PFS and OS, relative to outcomes seen in patients without these abnormalities. 7,9,14 Consequently, there remains an ongoing unmet need in patients with MM not only to improve absolute outcomes in high-risk patients but also to provide long-term disease control and overcome the poor prognosis associated with these cytogenetic abnormalities.…”
Section: Org Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…25 This is consistent with the FISH abnormalities used to define "high risk" in other phase 3 studies and analyses [with or without the rare t(14;20) translocation] in patients with MM. 7,9,[11][12][13][14][15] The presence of these abnormalities has previously been shown to be associated with poor outcomes, including poor PFS and OS, relative to outcomes seen in patients without these abnormalities. 7,9,14 Consequently, there remains an ongoing unmet need in patients with MM not only to improve absolute outcomes in high-risk patients but also to provide long-term disease control and overcome the poor prognosis associated with these cytogenetic abnormalities.…”
Section: Org Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13]15 The International Myeloma Working Group recently advised that newly diagnosed MM patients with high-risk cytogenetics should receive a combination of a proteasome inhibitor with lenalidomide or pomalidomide and dexamethasone, 10 noting the positive impact of these regimens on outcomes in patients with specific poor-prognosis abnormalities. Nevertheless, there remains a need for additional active therapeutic options for patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including regimens that allow for prolonged treatment and thus may offer extended disease control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ASPIRE, a significant increase in PFS was observed with carfilzomib regardless of patients' cytogenetic risk, where a 60% cut-off was used to define high-risk patients for t(4;14), t(14;16) and del(17p). In patients with high-risk CAs, there was a trend for increased PFS with carfilzomib compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone by 9 months (P = 0.083) (vs. an increased PFS of 10 months for patients with standard-risk cytogenetics; P = 0.003) (Avet-Loiseau et al, 2016). However, it must be noted that in both ENDEAVOR and ASPIRE carfilzomib treatment did not completely overcome the poor prognosis associated with high-risk CAs (Stewart et al, 2015;Chng et al, 2017;Avet-Loiseau et al, 2016).…”
Section: Patients With High-risk Cytogenetic Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…При исполь-зовании карфилзомиба в монорежиме ОО достигнут у 52 % бортезомиб-наивных больных с рецидивами [6], а у рефрактерных к бортезомибу -приблизительно у 20 % [7]. Карфил зомиб показал преимущество в те-рапии ММ, ассо циированной с высоким цитогенети-ческим риском: транслокации (4;14), (14;16) и делеция хромосомы 17, что было продемонстрировано в III фа-зе клинического исследования [8]. Пациенты (n = 417) были стратифицированы на 2 группы: высокий риск (n = 100) и стандартный риск (n = 317).…”
unclassified