Objectives
To evaluate whether a novel definition of spirometric respiratory impairment (Global Lung Initiative [GLI]) is strongly associated with respiratory symptoms and, in turn, frequently establishes symptomatic respiratory disease.
Design
Cross-sectional.
Setting
Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Participants
Community-dwelling, ages 40-80 (N=7,115).
Measurements
GLI-defined spirometric respiratory impairment (airflow-obstruction and restrictive-pattern), dyspnea on exertion (DOE), chronic bronchitis (CB), and wheezing.
Results
Among participants aged 40-80, prevalence rates were 12.7% and 6.2% for airflow-obstruction and restrictive-pattern and 28.6%, 12.6%, and 12.9% for DOE, CB, and wheezing, respectively. Relative to normal spirometry, airflow-obstruction was associated with DOE, CB, and wheezing—adjusted odds ratios (adjORs): 1.69 (1.42, 2.02), 1.92 (1.62, 2.29), and 2.50 (2.08, 3.00), respectively. Similarly, restrictive-pattern was associated with DOE, CB, and wheezing—adjORs: 1.75 (1.36, 2.25), 1.39 (1.08, 1.78) and 1.53 (1.15, 2.04), respectively. Among participants who had airflow-obstruction and restrictive-pattern, however, only a minority had DOE (38.6% and 45.5%), CB (23.3% and 15.9%), and wheezing (24.4% and 19.1%), respectively, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 53% for any respiratory symptom in the setting of any spirometric respiratory impairment. In addition, most participants who had DOE, CB, and wheezing did not have airflow-obstruction or restrictive-pattern (73.0%, 67.8%, and 66.8%, respectively), yielding a PPV of 26% for any spirometric respiratory impairment in the setting of any respiratory symptom. The results differed only modestly when stratified by the age groups of 40-64 and 65-80.
Conclusion
GLI-defined spirometric respiratory impairment increased the likelihood of respiratory symptoms relative to normal spirometry, but was nonetheless a poor predictor of respiratory symptoms. Similarly, respiratory symptoms were poor predictors of GLI-defined spirometric respiratory impairment. Hence, a comprehensive assessment is needed when evaluating respiratory symptoms, even in the presence of a spirometric respiratory impairment.