Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caring for Vincent

Abstract: The digitization of mental health care holds promises of affordable and ubiquitously available treatment, e.g., with conversational agents (chatbots). While technology can guide people to care for themselves, we examined how people can care for another being as a way to care for themselves. We created a self-compassion chatbot (Vincent) and compared between caregiving and care-receiving conditions. Care-giving Vincent asked participants to partake in self-compassion exercises. Care-receiving Vincent shared its… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With social chatbots [14], the scope of social support resources has broadened dramatically. Such chatbots may help people who are experiencing troubles and can be interacted with anywhere and anytime [6] while providing comforting and caring efects [55]. They can support people who feel isolated, both emotionally and physically, and provide instant feedback and supportive dialogue [6].…”
Section: Chatbots and Ofline Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With social chatbots [14], the scope of social support resources has broadened dramatically. Such chatbots may help people who are experiencing troubles and can be interacted with anywhere and anytime [6] while providing comforting and caring efects [55]. They can support people who feel isolated, both emotionally and physically, and provide instant feedback and supportive dialogue [6].…”
Section: Chatbots and Ofline Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to RE mode, MepsBot in AS mode is perceived significantly (H2a) easier to use, (H2b) more likeable, but (H2c) less useful in helping users to write comments to support others online. We adapt metrics from [10,43,56] to measure each aspect with one item on a standard 7-point Likert scale.…”
Section: Providers' Perception Of and Concerns About Mepsbot (Rq2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they are satisfied with it, the bot can further invite seekers to show their contentment in response by explaining the potential benefits (e.g., build a connection [39]) of doing so. If they are not, the bot could act as a friend to comfort the seekers and encourage them to disclosure their feeling to the bot [35][36][37]. However, designers should be aware that such technological interventions could potentially bring additional labor to the support-seekers [26] and frustrate support-seekers who are sensitive of being judged in OMHCs [25,77], and members should have the option to enable / disable such interventions.…”
Section: Eliciting Experienced Support-seekers'mentioning
confidence: 99%