2009
DOI: 10.1057/9780230234673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…98 This scheme determines any efforts in association, dissociation, participation, and separation; "from Schmitt's political theory, the friend/enemy principle emerges as the skeleton supporting and surviving all the various 'incarnations' of the political, from the Greek polis to the nation state, from the revolutionary party to the terrorist group." 99 The authors of our sample texts try to influence the readers to disapprove of the adversarial "other." Additionally, Post states the importance of the credo "It's not us-it's them" above all, especially for individuals with feelings of inadequacy or lack of success in their former lives.…”
Section: Most Common Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…98 This scheme determines any efforts in association, dissociation, participation, and separation; "from Schmitt's political theory, the friend/enemy principle emerges as the skeleton supporting and surviving all the various 'incarnations' of the political, from the Greek polis to the nation state, from the revolutionary party to the terrorist group." 99 The authors of our sample texts try to influence the readers to disapprove of the adversarial "other." Additionally, Post states the importance of the credo "It's not us-it's them" above all, especially for individuals with feelings of inadequacy or lack of success in their former lives.…”
Section: Most Common Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axtmann, 2007;Benhabib, 2012;Hooker, 2009;Koskenniemi, 2004;Legg, 2011;Odysseos and Petito, 2007;Scheuerman, 2006;Slomp, 2009;Teschke, 2011). Most noticeably, an appropriation of Schmitt from the Left has gained strength in the last decade (see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… On the recent Schmitt reception in political philosophy see for example Roland Axtmann; Catherine Colliot‐Thélène (1999); Jef Huysmans (2008); Andreas Kalyvas (2008); Tarik Kochi (2006); David Pan (2009); Sergei Prozorov (2005); William Rasch (1999, 2000, 2003); William E. Scheuerman (2006a); Gabriella Slomp (2009); Danilo Zolo (2002). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%