2002
DOI: 10.4171/rmi/326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carleson measures for analytic Besov spaces

Abstract: We characterize Carleson measures for the analytic Besov spaces. The problem is first reduced to a discrete question involving measures on trees which is then solved. Applications are given to multipliers for the Besov spaces and to the determination of interpolating sequences. The discrete theorem is also applied to analysis of function space on trees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
144
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luecking [26,29], characterized the q-Carleson measures for the space A p α , 0 < p, q < ∞. A good number of results about p-Carleson measures for Besov spaces and spaces of Dirichlet type of analytic functions have been obtained by different authors (see, e. g., [4], [5], [20], [21], [22], [33], [39], [42], [43], and [44]). …”
Section: S(i) = {Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Luecking [26,29], characterized the q-Carleson measures for the space A p α , 0 < p, q < ∞. A good number of results about p-Carleson measures for Besov spaces and spaces of Dirichlet type of analytic functions have been obtained by different authors (see, e. g., [4], [5], [20], [21], [22], [33], [39], [42], [43], and [44]). …”
Section: S(i) = {Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall use an argument which is closely related to that used by Arcozzi, Rochberg and Sawyer in the proof of [5,Theorem 7]. Let p, p and µ be as in Theorem 7.…”
Section: The Case P >mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrete case N is a particular case of a tree, and can be found in [8]. Weights for a general tree were studied, without the monotonicity condition, in [1,9]. It is easy to prove that a weight satisfying case 3 of corollary 2.3 must necessarily be in B p (N) (uniformly) on each geodesic (see [8]), but the converse is not true in general.…”
Section: If and Only If There Exists A Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now recall that |f | 2 R 2 u = (P + f,g |u|) 2 , and use the previous inequality in (4.9) together with the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality and the estimates (4.5) and (4.6) to obtain…”
Section: P and P + Are Equivalentmentioning
confidence: 99%