2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0030605315001192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carnivore occurrence: do interview-based surveys produce unreliable results?

Abstract: Interviews with local people have been widely used by biologists as a cost-effective approach to studying certain topics in wildlife ecology and conservation. However, doubts still exist about the validity and quality of the information gathered, especially in studies targeting cryptic or elusive species, such as carnivores. We assessed the reliability of interviews (n = 155) in detecting the presence of three species of carnivores with different characteristics, by comparing interview results with data obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
19
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also in agreement with the observation that local informants may overestimate the presence of conflictive and charismatic species, such as the puma (Caruso et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are also in agreement with the observation that local informants may overestimate the presence of conflictive and charismatic species, such as the puma (Caruso et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although this information was not acquired systematically, this method has been considered to be a relatively reliable approach in determining the species’ distribution (e.g. Brown & López González, 2001; Zeller et al, 2011; but see Caruso et al, 2016, regarding possible biases in interviews with local people). Nevertheless, the presence of jaguars passing through Chicbul should not be ruled out, as in other parts of south-eastern Mexico jaguars have been killed in areas dominated by agricultural and livestock activities and that are located at a considerable distance from forest covered areas (Hidalgo-Mihart et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local ecological knowledge has been used to provide information on species’ distributions and status over large landscapes, with moderate effort (Taubmann et al, 2016). However, there are limitations and caveats regarding its use (Caruso et al, 2017), especially when dealing with populations of large carnivores for which detectability is almost certainly < 1 (Louvrier et al, 2018), which can lead to false negatives (Kéry, 2011). Falsely assuming perfect detection can lead to an underestimation of the species’ distribution (Lahoz-Monfort et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%