2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2009.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carotenoid deactivation in an artificial light-harvesting complex via a vibrationally hot ground state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(84 reference statements)
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8). It also supports the conclusion of Motzkus and co-workers that S* is the vibrationally hot ground electronic state S 0 *, 4,8,36 yet the formation mechanism of the hot molecules from S 1 suggested here is in line with the very early study of Gillbro and co-workers. 9 Absorption features on the red side of the GSB, the transient spectral characteristics and the observed time constants are fully consistent with a vibrationally hot ground electronic state ( Fig.…”
Section: Global Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8). It also supports the conclusion of Motzkus and co-workers that S* is the vibrationally hot ground electronic state S 0 *, 4,8,36 yet the formation mechanism of the hot molecules from S 1 suggested here is in line with the very early study of Gillbro and co-workers. 9 Absorption features on the red side of the GSB, the transient spectral characteristics and the observed time constants are fully consistent with a vibrationally hot ground electronic state ( Fig.…”
Section: Global Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In previous studies, a different intensity dependence of S* and S 1 absorption has been reported, suggesting that the S* state absorption features become more prominent at increasing excitation intensities. 10,36 Papagiannakis et al suggested either an ''inhomogeneous model'', where excitation of two different ground state conformers is involved, or a ''two-photon model'', where an electronically excited state S* is populated from a higher electronic state after two-photon excitation (with S 1 being generated from S 2 ). They favored the latter model based on simulation results.…”
Section: Global Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the chain length of the investigated carotenoid, the S* lifetime can be substantially longer or on the same time scale as S 1 . As first described for long-chain β-carotene homologues, 14 S* has been interpreted as a separate electronic excited state, 1520 an excited state isomer, 21 a vibrationally hot ground state, populated by either Impulsive Stimulated Raman Scattering (ISRS) 22,23 or relaxation form S 1 , 24,25 the product of different ground state isomers, 11,26,27 or as the result of chemical impurities. 28 We note that none of the proposed energy level models is able to explain all experimental findings in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 46 48 The fact that removal of population from S 2 only affects S 1 but not S* lead to the interpretation that S 1 must be an electronic excited state, populated via S 2 , while S* must be populated instantaneously, i.e., by pump pulse-induced Raman-scattering 49 or by two-photon interaction. 21 For both interpretations, the pump pulse has to be spectrally broad in order to populate vibrationally high-lying states on S 0 . Jailaubekov et al 25 tested this aspect of the hot ground state hypothesis and found that S* gets populated, regardless of the spectral width of the pump pulse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%