Abstract1. Within the past several decades, resource trade-offs have emerged as the commonly accepted explanation for how carotenoid-based coloration links to individual performance. However, the literature on carotenoid signalling is inconsistent in how carotenoid resource trade-offs are defined, assessed and interpreted.2. We provide a clear statement of the resource trade-off hypothesis for explaining the honesty of carotenoid-based ornaments, its key assumptions and evidence for (or against) each assumption.3. Focusing on class Aves, we perform a critical assessment of theoretical and empirical evidence for carotenoid resource limitation and for direct physiological benefits of carotenoid pigments to immune and antioxidant performance.4. We identify important inconsistencies in how data related to physiological function and carotenoid coloration have been interpreted in the light of the resource trade-off hypothesis, and we suggest directions for future research.
K E Y W O R D Santioxidants, carotenoid pigments, coloration, ornamentation
| 1909Functional Ecology KOCH and HILL
Comparisons among classes of vertebrates or between verte-brates and invertebrates can provide important insights, but tackling physiological differences among major taxonomic groups further complicate an already complex topic. By focusing on birds in this review, we hope to highlight patterns and questions that will have important implications for other taxa, and we encourage application of the questions raised here to other systems.In this review, we assess trade-off mechanisms proposed to explain honest signalling in carotenoid-coloured ornaments while also considering evidence for the direct physiological benefits of carotenoids to the individual. In the process of evaluating the current state of understanding of the main assumptions of the carotenoid resource trade-off hypothesis, we examined 179 empirical studies of carotenoid-based traits in birds published between 1992 and 2017; we provide a list of these studies for reference (Supporting Information Table S1, Appendix S1, Figures S1 and S2 for more detail). While debates regarding the physiological benefits of carotenoids or whether carotenoids are limited resources are not new, here, we focus on a specific, unifying framework and its main predictions. We highlight where assessment can be made based on currently available data and highlight where more information is needed to adequately test the carotenoid resource trade-off hypothesis.
| A SSUMP TI ON 1: C AROTENOID LI M ITATI O NWithout carotenoid limitation, carotenoid resource trade-offs cannot be the basis for honest signalling in carotenoid-based traits.Thus, the question of whether carotenoids are limiting resources for birds is a central question related to the resource trade-off hypothesis in avian species (Hadfield & Owens, 2006;Hill, 1994;Hudon, 1994;Olson & Owens, 1998;Simons, Maia, Leenknegt, & Verhulst, 2014). An important distinction is that carotenoid limitation can be interpreted from two distinct perspectives:...