2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.10.015
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carotid IMT and Stiffness in the KiGGS 2 National Survey: Third-Generation Measurement, Quality Algorithms and Determinants of Completeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses were performed with STATA, Version A longitudinal weighting factor was applied to account for the clustered sample design, for drop-out and for deviations in the net sample from the population structure as described previously. 10 CIMT centiles were estimated separately for male and female participants, using the mean far wall CIMT of all available planes and generalized additive model for location, scale and shape, 8 a very flexible model class implemented in the gamlss package (Version 5.1-5; Stasinopoulos M. and Rigby B, 2019, http://gamlss.org) in R (Version 3.6.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Wien, 2019, http://www.Rproject.org. To attenuate the influence of extreme outliers, data were winsorized before modeling, that is, values of male participants <(25th percentile value [pct]-3.0×interquartile range) and values >(75th pct + 4.3×interquartile range) were set to the named limits (limits in female participants: 25pct −3.2×interquartile range, 75pct +3.7×interquartile range).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analyses were performed with STATA, Version A longitudinal weighting factor was applied to account for the clustered sample design, for drop-out and for deviations in the net sample from the population structure as described previously. 10 CIMT centiles were estimated separately for male and female participants, using the mean far wall CIMT of all available planes and generalized additive model for location, scale and shape, 8 a very flexible model class implemented in the gamlss package (Version 5.1-5; Stasinopoulos M. and Rigby B, 2019, http://gamlss.org) in R (Version 3.6.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Wien, 2019, http://www.Rproject.org. To attenuate the influence of extreme outliers, data were winsorized before modeling, that is, values of male participants <(25th percentile value [pct]-3.0×interquartile range) and values >(75th pct + 4.3×interquartile range) were set to the named limits (limits in female participants: 25pct −3.2×interquartile range, 75pct +3.7×interquartile range).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The follow-up survey from 2014 until 2017 offered an examination part for those who still lived in the 167 communities by three mobile examination teams. A CIMT measurement was performed in 4709 participants aged 14 to 28 years, 10 that is, in a predominantly postpubertal sample. For the longitudinal analysis of this sample, detailed data was available from the baseline examination conducted in 2003 to 2006.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computation of cS parameters was possible when blood pressure as well as valid outer lumen diameter at peak systole and end diastole were available ( Figure 1 ). The equations used for calculation of distensibility coefficient, Young's elastic modulus, Peterson's elastic modulus and β-stiffness index as well as rates of completeness (89%) are presented in detail elsewhere ( 28 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound examinations and data acquisition were performed semiautomatically using a portable state-of-the-art ultrasound system (UF-760AG, Fukuda Denshi Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Standard operating procedures, including computation of cIMT and cS parameters, adhered to current guidelines (26,27) and have been previously described in detail (28). Far wall common carotid IMT and outer lumen diameter were measured bilaterally in two planes (ear-to-ear and horizontal) within a 10 mm segment 10-15 mm proximal to the carotid bifurcation.…”
Section: Measurement Of Carotid Intima-media Thickness and Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%