1975
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197508000-00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carpometacarpal joint of the human thumb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrogoniometric studies with a gimbal coordinate system provide estimates on elbow [76] and wrist [19,84,94] ROM for functional activities. The functional CMC joint range is harder to assess even with constraining experiments [43,55,74], given the discrete but exacting motion of this joint and the functional restriction splints might impart [87].…”
Section: Thumb Motion Relative To the Upper Limbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrogoniometric studies with a gimbal coordinate system provide estimates on elbow [76] and wrist [19,84,94] ROM for functional activities. The functional CMC joint range is harder to assess even with constraining experiments [43,55,74], given the discrete but exacting motion of this joint and the functional restriction splints might impart [87].…”
Section: Thumb Motion Relative To the Upper Limbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomical studies of the hand and the thumb have been conducted to understand the joint structure and the mechanisms of actuation of the fingers [6]. For instance, the opposition mechanism of the thumb is assessed through anatomical analysis of hand skeletal bones [7], or analysis of the variability of the trapeziometacarpal motion [8]. It is well acknowledged that the loss of the thumb corresponds to the loss of 40% of the hand function [9], however, a common agreement on the mechanics of the human thumb opposition has not been reached yet [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, a detailed analysis of in vivo 3-D kinematics of the CMC joint has not been reported to date. The existing body of literature is based on cadaver studies [13,15,17,26], skin marker-based studies that track motion of the thumb, but not the trapezium [4,6,9,18,19,21,31], or single-subject imaging studies whose purpose has been to verify that flexion/extension and adduction/abduction are the primary degrees of freedom at the CMC joint [3,7]. Elucidation of OA pathogenesis requires quantitative methods capable of determining both bone rotations (osteokinematics) and articular surface translations (arthrokinematics) and large samples from different demographic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%