2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3323647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartel Stability in Experimental Auctions

Abstract: Using laboratory experiments, we compare the stability of bidding rings in the English auction and the first-price sealed-bid auction in a heterogeneous-value setting. In both a re-matching condition and a fixed-matching condition, we observe that bidding rings are more stable in the English auction than in the first-price sealed-bid auction. In both conditions, the first-price sealed-bid auction dominates the English auction in terms of revenue and the revenue spread. The English auction outperforms the first… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such evidence supports the external validity of laboratory experiments in which socially responsible behavior in markets is studied. 11 Recent examples include Fonseca & Normann (2012), Gomez-Martinez et al (2016), and Hinloopen et al (2019). For an overview, see Potters & Suetens (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such evidence supports the external validity of laboratory experiments in which socially responsible behavior in markets is studied. 11 Recent examples include Fonseca & Normann (2012), Gomez-Martinez et al (2016), and Hinloopen et al (2019). For an overview, see Potters & Suetens (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engelmann et al (2018) provide evidence that participants that act socially responsibly in experimental markets also reveal a preference for a fair-trade chocolate bar over a conventional one. Such evidence supports the external validity of laboratory experiments in which socially responsible behavior in markets is studied.11 Recent examples includeFonseca & Normann (2012),Gomez-Martinez et al (2016), andHinloopen et al (2019). For an overview, seePotters & Suetens (2013).12 Other oligopoly experiments that have consumer participants, in altogether different settings, areTyran & Engelmann (2005),Davis & Wilson (2008),and Orland & Selten (2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%