Cartographic Design and Aesthetics “FAQ”

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to provide a brief introduction to aesthetics and its relationship with cartographic design. We will not explore the topic in any detail or discuss problems associated with the creation of "rules" of design, but will instead focus on providing some concise definitions for the benefit of practicing mapmakers, especially those who are unfamiliar with the concept of aesthetics. We hope that these will encourage a greater appreciation of this under-researched topic and its significance within cartographic practice.

That’s a Relief: Assessing Beauty, Realism, and Landform Clarity in Multilayer Terrain Maps

“…Cartographers frequently debate aesthetics, because of cartography's close ties to art and visual representation. As Kent et al (2012) state "opinions are strong and varied [regarding aesthetics] and there are no universal rules, even though when we say a map is 'beautiful' we believe others ought to agree with us." Regardless of the data conveyed and message being shared, the map must appeal in its representation (Field and Demaj 2012).…”

“…The success of a terrain map is not dependent purely on how efficiently it conveys the information, but also on how it looks aesthetically. The function of the map and its graphical appearance are intertwined, and the visual effect of a map is constructed from the interplay of its elements (Kent et al 2012). Creating an effective terrain map takes time, artistry, and aesthetic sensitivity (Imhof 1982).…”