2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cas A and the Crab were not stellar binaries at death

Abstract: The majority of massive stars are in binaries, which implies that many core collapse supernovae (ccSNe) should be binaries at the time of the explosion. Here we show that the three most recent, local (visual) SNe (the Crab, Cas A and SN 1987A) were not binaries, with limits on the initial mass ratios of q = M 2 /M 1 < ∼ 0.1. No quantitative limits have previously been set for Cas A and the Crab, while for SN 1987A we merely updated existing limits in view of new estimates of the dust content. The lack of stell… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
3
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cas A supernova appears to have been a Type IIb based on light echo spectra which showed strong spectral similarities to the prototypical Type IIb event SN 1993J (Krause et al 2008;Rest et al 2008Rest et al , 2011. No surviving companion has been identified for Cas A, suggesting that if the system was a binary then either the two stars merged before the explosion, or the companion is a relatively faint, low mass dwarf star (Kochanek 2018;Kerzendorf et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Cas A supernova appears to have been a Type IIb based on light echo spectra which showed strong spectral similarities to the prototypical Type IIb event SN 1993J (Krause et al 2008;Rest et al 2008Rest et al , 2011. No surviving companion has been identified for Cas A, suggesting that if the system was a binary then either the two stars merged before the explosion, or the companion is a relatively faint, low mass dwarf star (Kochanek 2018;Kerzendorf et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…From pre-explosion images some SN IIb progenitors have been identified as yellow supergiants (e.g., SN 1993J, Aldering et al 1994SN 2011dh, Maund et al 2011Van Dyk et al 2011;SN 2013df, Van Dyk et al 2014andSN 2016gkg, Tartaglia et al 2017). In addition, for a handful of systems surviving companion candidates have been identified (e.g., SN 1993J, Maund et al 2004;Fox et al 2014;SN 2001ig, Ryder et al 2006, 2018andSN 2011dh, Folatelli et al 2014;Maund et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the assumption that SN IIn light-curve bumps are caused by SN ejecta encountering denser regions of CSM, the rarity of such bumps is noteworthy. Modelling (e.g., Kochanek 2009) and observations (Sana et al 2012;Dunstall et al 2015;Kochanek 2018) suggest that at least 50% of massive stars reside in binary or multiple systems. In such binaries, the mass lost by the constituent stars can be shaped into spiral patterns (Tuthill et al 2008) which could cause light-curve bumps if one of the stars explodes as a CSI-dominated SN (as invoked by Schwarz & Pringle 1996.…”
Section: The Frequency Of Sn Iin Light-curve Bumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, none of these searches for companions of Type II SNe resulted in a detection, establishing upper limits on possible companions for the Type II-P SN 2005cs Li et al 2006), the Type II-P SN 2008bk (Mattila et al 2008) and for the Type II-peculiar SN1987A (Kochanek 2017). In addition, the Crab, which was probably a Type II SN, seems to lack a surviving companion (Kochanek 2018). Thus, our predictions are consistent with the so-far lack Article number, page 17 of 19 A&A proofs: manuscript no.…”
Section: No Stellar Companions Expected For Type II Snementioning
confidence: 99%