2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellin.2023.100080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cas12a-based one-pot SNP detection with high accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 A-B)( J. S. Chen et al., 2018 ; Ding et al., 2020 ; Gootenberg et al., 2018 ; Joung et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2022 ; Teng et al., 2019 ; H. X. Zhang et al., 2023 ). The detection limit for two-steps reaction using CtCas12a reached 200 ag per reaction for DNA substrate containing EV71 sequence, equivalent to~6.5 copies/uL ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6 A-B)( J. S. Chen et al., 2018 ; Ding et al., 2020 ; Gootenberg et al., 2018 ; Joung et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2022 ; Teng et al., 2019 ; H. X. Zhang et al., 2023 ). The detection limit for two-steps reaction using CtCas12a reached 200 ag per reaction for DNA substrate containing EV71 sequence, equivalent to~6.5 copies/uL ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For application of nucleic acids detection, Cas effector is usually applied after target amplification, and such tolerance would not often cause false positive outcomes due to enrichment of its target sequences by isothermal amplification ( J. S. Chen et al., 2018 ; Ding et al., 2020 ; Gootenberg et al., 2018 ; Gootenberg et al., 2017 ; Joung et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2022 ; Teng et al., 2019 ; H. X. Zhang et al., 2023 ). In addition, it is worth to explore the potential off-target editing outcomes of CtCas12a in human cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4] Previous reports have suggested that sensitivity reductions in one-pot systems are a result of the exonuclease activity (ciscleavage) of the Cas-based ribonucleoprotein (RNP), which hydrolyses target DNA and hinders efficient nucleic acid amplification. [5] Based on this hypothesis, we decided to explore whether deliberate modulation of the functional concentration of the Cas-based RNP at the start of the assay could be leveraged to control exonuclease activity and ultimately lead to improved signal generation in one-pot RPA-CRISPR-Cas12a assays. We evaluate the individual aspects of this approach, including the kinetics of RNP formation, cis exonuclease activity, and the diffusion of key reaction components to develop a mathematical model for determining optimal cis cleavage rates in RPA-CRISPR-Cas12 assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have suggested that at low nucleic acid concentrations, target cleavage can outcompete target amplification, thus hamstringing the entire signal generation cascade. [5,11,12] The simplest methods for minimizing this competition involve initially separating the CRISPR and NAAT reactions within the same vessel, and then combining them after a defined period. A popular way to achieve this is to store the CRISPR-Cas reaction components in the lid of a reaction tube, and then perform an NAAT reaction in the bottom of the same tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%