2018
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascade and no‐repetition rules are comparable controls for the auditory frequency mismatch negativity in oddball tasks

Abstract: The mismatch negativity (MMN) has been widely studied with oddball tasks to index processing of unexpected auditory change. The MMN is computed as the difference of deviant minus standard and is used to capture the pattern violation by the deviant. However, this oddball MMN is confounded because the deviant differs physically from the standard and is presented less often. To improve measurement, the same tone as the deviant is presented in a separate condition. This control tone is equiprobable with other tone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the CAS paradigm not only controlled for the presentation rate of the deviant stimuli but also the frequency difference (ascending or descending, Fig. 1 b) between standards and deviants in the oddball sequences 45 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the CAS paradigm not only controlled for the presentation rate of the deviant stimuli but also the frequency difference (ascending or descending, Fig. 1 b) between standards and deviants in the oddball sequences 45 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, SSA and DD represent important, complementary phenomena-the ability to adapt to contextually redundant information (SSA) while maintaining the ability to detect when a change occurs (DD) that might signal relevant, important information. Notably, most of the research regarding these phenomena has been carried out in the auditory and visual systems, and thoughtful experimental design efforts to differentiate SSA and DD (Figure 1) are an emerging trend in the study of sensory context processing (Harms et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015;Hamm and Yuste, 2016;Wiens et al, 2019). For example, sensory ''oddball'' paradigms involve the presentation of a repetitive, highly probable ''standard'' (or ''redundant'') stimulus typically occurring between 75-95% of trials (which occur rapidly, at least once every second) with a rarer interspersed ''target'' (or ''deviant'') stimulus ( Figure 1A).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I used three different alternative hypotheses to assess the robustness of the results, as recommended (Dienes, 2014;Dienes & McLatchie, 2018) and as used in previous research in my lab (Ströberg, Andersen, & Wiens, 2017;Wiens, Szychowska, Eklund, & van Berlekom, 2018). For the uniform distribution, the true effect was supposed to fall between 0 and 0.038, and all values were equally likely.…”
Section: Bayesian Hypothesis Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%