2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1805.06413
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CASCADE: Contextual Sarcasm Detection in Online Discussion Forums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…incorporated images along with the corresponding captions for detecting inter-modal incongruity. Hazarika et al (2018) extracted contextual information from the discourse of a discussion thread, encoded stylometric and personality features of the users, and subsequently used content-based features for sarcasm detection in online social media. Cai, Cai, and Wan (2019) exploited the multi-stage hierarchical fusion mechanism for multimodal sarcasm detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…incorporated images along with the corresponding captions for detecting inter-modal incongruity. Hazarika et al (2018) extracted contextual information from the discourse of a discussion thread, encoded stylometric and personality features of the users, and subsequently used content-based features for sarcasm detection in online social media. Cai, Cai, and Wan (2019) exploited the multi-stage hierarchical fusion mechanism for multimodal sarcasm detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to English, only a few studies have been made on Arabic sarcasm detection. Among the studies completed in this area are research by (Riloff et al, 2013;Oprea and Magdy, 2019;Joshi et al, 2016;Bamman and Smith 2015;Campbell and Katz, 2012;Amir et al, 2016;Hazarika et al, 2018). (Oprea and Magdy, 2020) show the effect of sociocultural variables on sarcasm communication online, which makes the performance of models trained on English unpredictable, if they are trained on other languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Mukherjee and Bala (2017) report that including features independent of the text leads to ameliorating the performance of sarcasm models. To this end, studies take three forms of context as feature: 1) author context (Hazarika et al, 2018;Bamman and Smith, 2015), 2) conversational context (Wang et al, 2015), and 3) topical context (Ghosh and Veale, 2017). Another popular line of research utilizes various user embedding techniques that encode users' stylometric and personality features to improve their sarcasm detection models (Hazarika et al, 2018).…”
Section: Context-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, studies take three forms of context as feature: 1) author context (Hazarika et al, 2018;Bamman and Smith, 2015), 2) conversational context (Wang et al, 2015), and 3) topical context (Ghosh and Veale, 2017). Another popular line of research utilizes various user embedding techniques that encode users' stylometric and personality features to improve their sarcasm detection models (Hazarika et al, 2018). Their model, CAS-CADE, utilizes user embeddings that encode stylometric and personality features of the users.…”
Section: Context-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%